Are virtues the proper starting point for morality?

In James Lawrence Dreier (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 99--112 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory.James Lawrence Dreier (ed.) - 2006 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Critical Notice. [REVIEW]John Edelman - 1997 - Philosophical Investigations 20 (4):326-346.
Critical Notice. [REVIEW]John Edelman - 1997 - Philosophical Investigations 20 (4):326-346.
Virtue and nature.Christopher W. Gowans - 2008 - Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):28-55.
Virtue and Nature.Christopher W. Gowans - 2008 - Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):28-55.
On virtue ethics.Paul Crittenden - 2002 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (1):114 – 116.
Morality without Moral Facts.Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons - 2006 - In James Lawrence Dreier (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 6--220.
Moral contractarianism as a foundation for interpersonal morality.Samuel Freeman - 2006 - In James Lawrence Dreier (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 6--57.
Neo-Aristotelianism.Rosalind Hursthouse - 1999 - In Nigel Warburton (ed.), Philosophy: the basic readings. New York: Routledge. pp. 110-122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
6 (#711,559)

6 months
212 (#96,067)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rosalind Hursthouse
University of Auckland

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references