Science, Respect for Nature, and Human Well-Being: Democratic Values and the Responsibilities of Scientists Today

Foundations of Science 21 (1):51-67 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The central question addressed is: How should scientific research be conducted so as to ensure that nature is respected and the well being of everyone everywhere enhanced? After pointing to the importance of methodological pluralism for an acceptable answer and to obstacles posed by characterizing scientific methodology too narrowly, which are reinforced by the ‘commercial-scientific ethos’, two additional questions are considered: How might research, conducted in this way, have impact on—and depend on—strengthening democratic values and practices? And: What is thereby implied for the responsibilities of scientists today?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-10-21

Downloads
116 (#43,765)

6 months
15 (#941,355)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugh Lacey
Swarthmore College

References found in this work

Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal.Heather Douglas - 2009 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Science, truth, and democracy.Philip Kitcher - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Philosophy of Science After Feminism.Janet A. Kourany - 2010 - , US: Oxford University Press.
Social Theory and Social Structure.Lawrence Haworth - 1961 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (44):345-346.

View all 19 references / Add more references