European Journal of Political Theory 17 (1):1474885115591344 (2018)
AbstractI demonstrate that a set of well-known objections defeat John Stuart Mill’s plural voting proposal, but do not defeat plural voting as such. I adopt the following as a working definition of political equality: a voting system is egalitarian if and only if departures from a baseline of equally weighted votes are normatively permissible. I develop an alternative proposal, called procedural plural voting, which allocates plural votes procedurally, via the free choices of the electorate, rather than according to a substantive standard of competence. The alternative avoids standards objections to Mill’s proposal. Moreover, reflection on the alternative plural voting scheme disrupts our intuitions about what counts as an egalitarian voting system. Undue emphasis on Mill’s version of plural voting obscures three important reasons to reject plural voting in favor of strictly egalitarian voting systems: that certain choices that generate inequalities of political power are morally impermissible; that even...
Similar books and articles
J.S. Mill on Plural Voting, Competence and Participation.J. J. Miller - 2003 - History of Political Thought 24 (4):647-667.
Compulsory Voting: A Critical Perspective.Annabelle Lever - 2010 - British Journal of Political Science 40:897-915.
'A Liberal Defence of Compulsory Voting': Some Reasons for Scepticism.Annabelle Lever - 2008 - POLITICS 28 (1):61-64.
Pareto Improvements by Pareto Strategic Voting Under Majority Voting with Risk Loving and Risk Avoiding Voters — A Note.I. D. A. Macintyre - 1995 - Theory and Decision 39 (2):207-211.
Postulates and Paradoxes of Relative Voting Power - A Critical Re-Appraisal.Dan S. Felsenthal - 1995 - Theory and Decision 38 (2):195-229.
A Characterization of Majority Voting Rules with Quorums.Nicolas Houy - 2009 - Theory and Decision 67 (3):295-301.
Compulsory Voting and Inclusion: A Response to Saunders.Clara Fischer - 2011 - POLITICS 31 (1):2011.
The Epistemic Edge of Majority Voting Over Lottery Voting.Yann Allard-Tremblay - 2012 - Res Publica 18 (3):207-223.
Against a Minimum Voting Age.Philip Cook - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (3):439-458.
Making Statements and Approval Voting.Enriqueta Aragones, Itzhak Gilboa & Andrew Weiss - 2011 - Theory and Decision 71 (4):461-472.
Groups Can Make a Difference: Voting Power Measures Extended. [REVIEW]Claus Beisbart - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (3):469-488.
Suitable Properties for Any Electronic Voting System.Jean-Luc Koning & Didier Dubois - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (4):251-260.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Political Equality, Plural Voting, and the Leveling Down Objection.David Peña-Rangel - 2022 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 21 (2):122-164.
References found in this work
Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical.John Rawls - 1985 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (3):223-251.