Facts, fetishes, and the parliament of things: Is there any space for critique?

Social Epistemology 20 (2):185 – 199 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bruno Latour equates criticism with an iconoclastic urge that is underpinned by the project of modernity. Latour's attack on iconoclastic criticism is therefore closely linked to his rejection of the modern framework. This paper examines Latour's analysis of modernity and the ways in which he connects criticism to the project of modernity. Through our analysis of Latour's reading of an episode from U.R. Anantha Murthy's novel Bharathipura, we argue that critique is actually an integral part of a truly democratic knowledge-making process as well as politics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Latour's Heidegger.Jeff Kochan - 2010 - Social Studies of Science 40 (4):579-598.
Cosmopolitics and the Subaltern.Matthew C. Watson - 2011 - Theory, Culture and Society 28 (3):55-79.
On equal temperament.Michael Halewood - 2015 - History of the Human Sciences 28 (3):3-21.
Rescuing the Gorgias from Latour.Jeff Kochan - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4):395-422.
Science studies and language suppression—A critique of Bruno Latour's we have never been modern.Sande Cohen - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (2):339-361.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#315,228)

6 months
9 (#355,374)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Cosmopolitics and the Subaltern.Matthew C. Watson - 2011 - Theory, Culture and Society 28 (3):55-79.
Critical philosophy of technology: The basic issues.Hans Radder - 2008 - Social Epistemology 22 (1):51 – 70.

Add more citations