Throwing the baby out with the bathwater? Moral status and rights-based moral obligations
American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):46 – 47 (2008)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.1080/15265160802248310
My notes
Similar books and articles
Righting ecofeminist ethics: The scope and use of moral entitlement.Rachel Brown - 2004 - Environmental Ethics 26 (3):247-265.
Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things.Mary Anne Warren - 1997 - Clarendon Press.
Traditional Catholic philosophy: baby and bathwater.James Franklin - 2006 - In Michael Whelan (ed.), Issues for Church and Society in Australia. Sydney, Australia: St Pauls. pp. 15-32.
Opposing views on animal experimentation: Do animals have rights?Tom L. Beauchamp - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):113 – 121.
Moral agency in other animals.Paul Shapiro - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):357-373.
Collective Rights and Minority Rights.Seumas Miller - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):241-257.
Dupoux and Jacob's moral instincts: throwing out the baby, the bathwater and the bathtub.Susan Dwyer - 2008 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (1):1-2.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
29 (#405,036)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
2009-01-28
Downloads
29 (#405,036)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Response to Commentaries on “A Critical Analysis of the Concept and Discourse of 'Unborn Child'”.Laurence B. McCullough & Frank A. Chervenak - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):4-6.
References found in this work
When Did I Begin?: Conception of the Human Individual in History, Philosophy, and Science.Norman M. Ford - 1988 - Cambridge University Press.
Aquinas’s Theory of Natural Law: An Analytic Reconstruction.Anthony J. Lisska - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
