Bioethics 27 (2):59-64 (2013)
A number of authors have objected to potential parents' use of reproductive genetic technologies on the grounds that the use of these technologies reflects a morally problematic attitude toward parenting. More specifically, proponents of this view have argued that such a choice is inconsistent with the unconditional acceptance that lies at the heart of praiseworthy parental attitudes. This paper offers a rebuttal of this view by arguing that it is possible for a parent to exhibit unconditional acceptance of the child herself without accepting each of that child's traits. If this is true, the use of reproductive genetic technologies does not inherently undermine appropriate parental attitudes. Further, by working to change some of a child's specific traits, a parent may instead exemplify an aspirational aspect of praiseworthy parenting and so demonstrate appropriate parental attitudes
|Keywords||decision‐making parent reproductive technologies genetic ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Case for a Parental Duty to Use Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Medical Benefit.Janet Malek & Judith Daar - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (4):3-11.
Parental Virtue and Prenatal Genetic Alteration Research.Ryan Tonkens - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (4):651-664.
Similar books and articles
Gay Science: Assisted Reproductive Technologies and the Sexual Orientation of Children.Timothy F. Murphy - 2005 - Reproductive Biomedicine Online 10 (Sup. 1):102-106.
Understanding Risks and Benefits in Research on Reproductive Genetic Technologies.Janet Malek - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (4):339 – 358.
Reproductive and Parental Autonomy: An Argument for Compulsory Parental Education.Lisa Bortolotti & Daniela Cutas - 2009 - Reproductive Biomedicine Online 19 (ethics suppl.):5-14.
Genetic Engineering to Avoid Genetic Neglect: From Chance to Responsibility.Jessica Hammond - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (4):160-169.
Legal Responses to Some of the New Developments in Reproductive Technologies Part.3 The Future of Reproductive Technologies and the Law.Andrew Scott - 2002 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 8 (2):24 - 28.
Selecting Children: The Ethics of Reproductive Genetic Engineering.S. Matthew Liao - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):973-991.
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Choosing the “Good Enough” Child. [REVIEW]Helen Watt - 2004 - Health Care Analysis 12 (1):51-60.
Parental Tort Liability for Direct Preimplantation Genetic Interventions: Technological Harms, the Social Model of Disability, and Questions of Identity.Kirsten Rabe Smolensky - unknown
Procreative Reasons-Relevance: On the Moral Significance of Why We Have Children.Mianna Lotz - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (5):291-299.
Identity, Harm, and the Ethics of Reproductive Technology.Janet Malek - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (1):83 – 95.
Creating a Stem Cell Donor: A Case Study in Reproductive Genetics.Jeffrey P. Kahn & Anna C. Mastroianni - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (1):81-96.
On Being Genetically "Irresponsible".Judith Andre, Leonard M. Fleck & Thomas Tomlinson - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (2):129-146.
How Safe is Safe Enough?: Obligations to the Children of Reproductive Technology.Philip G. Peters - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Children's Human Rights to Natural Biological Origins and Family Structure.Margaret Somerville - 2011 - Bioethics Research Notes 23 (1):1.
The Texture of Reproductive Choice : Law, Ethnography, and Reproductive Technologies.Thérèse Murphy - 2009 - In New Technologies and Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-07-05
Total downloads44 ( #119,500 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,811 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?