Synthese 83 (3):337 - 355 (1990)

Authors
Ron Martin
Lynchburg College
Abstract
Much speculation on the sources of Duhem's historical interests fails to account for the major shifts in these interests: neither his belief in the continuous development of physics nor his Catholicism, when his Church was encouraging the study of generally Aristotelian scholastic thought, led to any interest in mediaeval science before 1904. Equally, his own claim that he was merely testing his views on the nature of physical theory is easily squared only with earlier work with no trace of mediaeval science. Behind this discontinuity lies a major crisis. Though not a positivist, Duhem had based all his work on assumptions acceptable to positivists. One of these, the sterility of the Middle Ages, was refuted by his chance discovery of evidence of genuine mediaeval science in the autumn of 1903, but that left the doctrine of scholastic sterility intact.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00413420
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,775
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Origins of Modern Science.Herbert Butterfield - 1951 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1 (4):332-333.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Pierre Duhem’s Use of the Return to the Sources as a Justification Tool.Benjamin Le Roux & Marcin Krasnodębski - 2017 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 3:37-50.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Duhem on Maxwell: A Case-Study in the Interrelations of History of Science and Philosophy of Science.Roger Ariew & Peter Barker - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:145 - 156.
The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory.Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem - 1954 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Duhem's Physicalism.Paul Needham - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (1):33-62.
Error Statistics and Duhem's Problem.Gregory R. Wheeler - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):410-420.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
50 ( #206,270 of 2,432,668 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #294,596 of 2,432,668 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes