Live Free or Die [Book Review]
Animal Law 17 (1):243-250 (2010)
In On Their Own Terms (Darien, CT: Nectar Bat Press, 2010), Lee Hall articulates a theory that wild animals, due to their autonomous nature, are endowed with rights, but domesticated animals lack rights because they are not autonomous. Hall then argues that the rights of wild animals require that humans let them alone, and that, despite the fact that domestic animals lack rights, humans are required to take care of them because it is humans who brought them into existence. While sympathetic to Hall's aims, this review concludes that Hall’s theory denies rights to domestic animals only by employing theoretical means that are uncomfortably analogous to how others have denied rights to all nonhuman animals.
|Keywords||animal ethics animal rights domestic animals neutering|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Animal Rights and the Problem of Proximity.David E. W. Fenner - 1998 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):51-61.
Zoos and Animal Rights: The Ethics of Keeping Animals.Stephen St C. Bostock - 1993 - Routledge.
Animal Rights: Autonomy and Redundancy. [REVIEW]David Sztybel - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):259-273.
Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness.Kelly Oliver - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Before the Law: Humans and Other Animals in a Biopolitical Frame.Cary Wolfe - 2013 - University of Chicago Press.
Opposing Views on Animal Experimentation: Do Animals Have Rights?Tom L. Beauchamp - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):113 – 121.
Added to index2011-04-17
Total downloads14 ( #331,427 of 2,164,866 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,012 of 2,164,866 )
How can I increase my downloads?