Systematic Reviews in Bioethics: Types, Challenges, and Value


Abstract
There has recently been interest in applying the techniques of systematic review to bioethics literature. In this paper, I identify the three models of systematic review proposed to date in bioethics: systematic reviews of empirical bioethics research, systematic reviews of normative bioethics literature, and systematic reviews of reasons. I argue that all three types yield information useful to scholarship in bioethics, yet they also face significant challenges particularly in relation to terminology and time. Drawing on my recent experience conducting a systematic review, I suggest that complete comprehensiveness may not always be an appropriate goal of a literature review in bioethics, depending on the research question. In some cases, all the relevant ideas may be captured without capturing all the relevant literature. I conclude that systematic reviews in bioethics have an important role to play alongside the traditional broadbrush approach to reviewing literature in bioethics
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/jht059
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,206
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How to Write a Systematic Review of Reasons.D. Strech & N. Sofaer - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (2):121-126.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-15

Total views
20 ( #459,951 of 2,285,632 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #839,861 of 2,285,632 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature