Why I Talk to My Dog

Environmental Philosophy 11 (1):17-26 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is a common experience that we talk to some animals, especially those with which we share our human lives, such as dogs or cats. From this communication, should one conclude that these animals participate in intersubjectivity? Though Husserl’s phenomenology has a “Cartesian” tendency, in his late reflections on the variations of “normal” consciousness and the “normal” body, he suggests that there are degrees of subjectivity, following a more “Leibnizian” path. Scheler, Merleau-Ponty, and Levinas have also developed this thesis of a “sympathy” with animals beyond the limits of the human species.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is a World without Animals Possible?Annabelle Dufourcq - 2014 - Environmental Philosophy 11 (1):71-91.
Editorial Preface.Annabelle Dufourcq - 2014 - Environmental Philosophy 11 (1):5-7.
On Sharing a World with Other Animals.Kelly Oliver - 2019 - Environmental Philosophy 16 (1):35-56.
The Objects of Respect.Elizabeth Foreman - 2015 - Environmental Ethics 37 (1):57-73.
Problem Animals.Anna Peterson - 2019 - Environmental Ethics 41 (2):129-141.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
3 (#1,729,579)

6 months
16 (#172,419)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references