Paradox lost? No, paradox found! Reply to Tomasello and Akhtar

Cognition 88 (3):325-329 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00047-7

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,006

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What paradox? A response to Naigles.Michael Tomasello & Nameera Akhtar - 2003 - Cognition 88 (3):317-323.
Reservations about the Underlying Logic.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 2006 - In Jonathan L. Kvanvig (ed.), The Knowability Paradox. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.
The self and what it's like to be one: Reviews of josé Luis bermúdez, the paradox of self-conciousness and Lawrence Weiskrantz, consiousness lost and found.Joseph Levine - 2001 - Mind and Language 16 (1):108–119.
Tomasello, Vygotsky, and the Phylogenesis of Mind: A Reply to Potapov’s “Objectification and the Labour of the Negative in the Origin of Human Thinking”.Chris Drain - 2021 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (6):23-29.
A Paradox of Information.A Comment on Miller's New Paradox of Information.A Paradox of Zero Information.Miller's So-called Paradox: A Reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.Miller's paradox of Information.The Straight and Narrow Rule of Induction: A Reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.New Mysteries for Old: The Transfiguration of Miller's Paradox.David Miller, Karl R. Popper, Jeffrey Bub & Michael Radner - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.
The role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: a reply to Tomasello.Cynthia Fisher - 2002 - Cognition 82 (3):259-278.
Paradox lost, paradox regained: Reply from a flagellated straw man.James V. Bradley - 1983 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21 (1):69-72.
More on 'A Liar Paradox'.Richard G. Heck - 2012 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (4):270-280.
David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145. [REVIEW]Richard C. Jeffrey - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.
Paradox Lost.W. J. Huggett - 1958 - Analysis 19 (1):21 - 23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
31 (#579,324)

6 months
11 (#532,630)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Becoming syntactic.Franklin Chang, Gary S. Dell & Kathryn Bock - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (2):234-272.

Add more citations

References found in this work

View all 8 references / Add more references