Self and will

When do two mental items belong to the same life? We could be content with the answer -just when they have certain volitional qualities in common. An affinity is noted between that theory and Berkeley's early doctrine of the self. Some rivals of the volitional theory invoke a spiritual or physical owner of mental items. They run a risk either of empty formality or of causal superstition. Other rivals postulate a non-transitive and symmetrical relation in the set of mental items. They must allow in consequence either for joint ownership of one and the same mental item, or for incompatible simultaneous decisions by one and the same person, or for new forms of death. This makes them disquieting. Another rival invokes a transitive and symmetrical relation defined in terms of co-consciousness. Even that allows for incongruous simultaneities. The volitional theory is free from such disadvantages.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09672559708570846
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,831
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
Time and Division.Barry F. Dainton - 1992 - Ratio 5 (2):102-128.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Consciousness as a Guide to Personal Persistence.Barry Dainton & Tim Bayne - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (4):549-571.
The Self and the Phenomenal.Barry F. Dainton - 2004 - Ratio 17 (4):365-89.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
19 ( #287,561 of 2,214,215 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #240,048 of 2,214,215 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature