Some Metaphysical Implications of a Credible Ethics of Belief

In New Essays on Belief: Structure, Constitution, and Content. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 230-250 (2013)

Rik Peels
VU University Amsterdam
Any plausible ethics of belief must respect that normal agents are doxastically blameworthy for their beliefs in a range of non-exotic cases. In this paper, we argue, first, that together with independently motivated principles this constraint leads us to reject occurrentism as a general theory of belief. Second, we must acknowledge not only dormant beliefs, but tacit beliefs as well. Third, a plausible ethics of belief leads us to acknowledge that a difference in propositional content cannot in all contexts count as a criterion for belief individuation. In some contexts, we need to individuate beliefs in a different manner, namely in such a way that they have at least part of their causal history essentially.
Keywords Ethics of Belief  Ability to Believe Otherwise  Belief Individuation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Response to Critics: The Influence Account of Responsible Belief Defended.Rik Peels - 2018 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 26 (4):633-643.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Metaphysical Implications of Ecology.J. Baird Callicott - 1986 - Environmental Ethics 8 (4):301-316.
Metaphysical Implications From Physics and Ecology.Alan Wittbecker - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (3):275-282.
Why Responsible Belief is Blameless Belief.Anthony Booth & Rik Peels - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (5):257-265.
Fixing Perceptual Belief.Gerald Vision - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (235):292-314.
A Defence of the Ramsey Test.Richard Bradley - 2007 - Mind 116 (461):1-21.
The Ethics of Belief.Andrew Chignell - 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Can There Be a Knowledge-First Ethics of Belief?Dennis Whitcomb - 2014 - In Jonathan Matheson & Rico Vits (eds.), The Ethics of Belief: Individual and Social. Oxford University Press.
Belief's Own Ethics.J. Adler - 2002 - MIT Press.
Belief-Desire Explanation.Nikolaj Nottelmann - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (12):912-921.


Added to PP index

Total views
377 ( #16,772 of 2,311,308 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #15,561 of 2,311,308 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature