Journal of Military Ethics 16 (1-2):78-93 (2017)

Authors
Peter Olsthoorn
Netherlands Defence Academy
Abstract
In recent years, it has been argued more than once that situations determine our conduct to a much greater extent than our character does. This argument rests on the findings of social psychologists such as Stanley Milgram, who have popularized the idea that we can all be brought to harm innocent others. An increasing number of philosophers and ethicists make use of such findings, and some of them have argued that this so-called situationist challenge fatally undermines virtue ethics. As virtue ethics is currently the most popular underpinning for ethics education in the military, it is important to know to what extent the claim situationists make is correct. Fortunately, a closer look indicates that an interactionist perspective, with our character and the situation interplaying, is more accurate than the situationist perspective.
Keywords character  responsibility  situationism  virtue  virtue ethics  Milgram  Zimbardo
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
DOI 10.1080/15027570.2017.1356605
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Military Ethics and the Situationist Critique.Nathan L. Cartagena - 2017 - Journal of Military Ethics 16 (3-4):157-172.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Virtue Ethics in the Military.Peter Olsthoorn - 2014 - In Stan van Hooft (ed.), The Handbook of Virtue Ethics. Routledge. pp. 365-374.
The Possibility of Virtue.Miguel Alzola - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2):377-404.
Skepticism About Character Traits.Gilbert Harman - 2009 - The Journal of Ethics 13 (2-3):235 - 242.
Reconciling Situational Social Psychology with Virtue Ethics.Surendra Arjoon - 2008 - International Journal of Management Reviews 10 (3):221-243.
Does Habit Interference Explain Moral Failure?James Bernard Murphy - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (2):255-273.
Virtue Ethics and Situationist Personality Psychology.Maria Merritt - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):365-383.
Psychology and Virtue Epistemology: Three Studies.Mohammad Reza Esnaashari Lahroodi - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Virtue Cultivation in Light of Situationism.Christian Miller - 2016 - In Julia Annas, Nancy Snow & Darcia Narvaez (eds.), Developing the Virtues: Integrating Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 157-183.
Aristotelian Moral Psychology and the Situationist Challenge.Adam M. Croom - 2015 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 46:262-277.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-08-10

Total views
292 ( #32,678 of 2,454,812 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #58,989 of 2,454,812 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes