The Necessity of “Necessity”: Hume’s Psychology of Sophisticated Causal Inference

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):263-287 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Much of what Hume calls probable reasoning is deliberate and reflective. Since there are aspects to Hume’s psychology that tempt some commentators to think, on the contrary, that for Hume all such reasoning is simple and immediate, I will be concerned to emphasize Hume’s recognition of the sophisticated sort of probable reasoning (section I). Though some of the details of my case may be new, the overall point of this section should not be news to recent scholarship. But once we recognize that this reflective and deliberate reasoning constitutes a significant portion of all probable reasoning, it becomes legitimate to ask how Hume accommodates this reasoning in his psychology, his ‘science of man.’ I believe that ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-22

Downloads
96 (#57,777)

6 months
22 (#694,291)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Abe (Abraham) Roth
Ohio State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Treatise of Human Nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (33):379-380.
Cognition and commitment in Hume's philosophy.Don Garrett - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Perceptual entitlement.Tyler Burge - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):503-48.

View all 37 references / Add more references