The Merited Response Argument and Artistic Categories

Abstract
The merited response argument is an argument in favor of artistic ethicism. According to this view, the interaction between art and morality is such that a moral defect in a work of art negatively influences the work's artistic value (and a moral merit, when relevant, is always an artistic merit). I contend that the argument relies on a criterion of aesthetic and artistic relevance that, when properly understood, fails to constitute a premise that either the artistic contextualist or the autonomist would accept. I then offer a version of the merited response argument that supports artistic contextualism and argue that, given certain controversial assumptions, immoral art in the Western tradition is more common than typically acknowledged in the recent literature on the topic
Keywords Art and Ethics  Artistic Value  Categories of Art
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/jaac.12017
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,195
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Art, Emotion and Ethics.Berys Nigel Gaut - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
In Defense of Artistic Value.Andrew Huddleston - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):705-714.
The Character and Role of Principles in the Evaluation of Art.James Shelley - 2002 - British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):37-51.
The Myth of (Non-Aesthetic) Artistic Value.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):518-536.
A Functional View of Artistic Evaluation.Jonathan Gilmore - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (2):289-305.
Aesthetic, Ethical, and Cognitive Value.Cain Todd - 2007 - South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):216-227.
The 'Fine Art' of Pornography?Christopher Bartel - 2010 - In Dave Monroe (ed.), Porn: Philosophy for Everyone. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 153--65.
Immoralism and the Anti-Theoretical View.Robert Stecker - 2008 - British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):145-161.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2013-08-07

Total downloads

35 ( #146,079 of 2,163,979 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #129,103 of 2,163,979 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums