Rules of engagement: perspectives on stakeholder engagement for genomic biobanking research in South Africa
BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):13 (2018)
AbstractGenomic biobanking research is undergoing exponential growth in Africa raising a host of legal, ethical and social issues. Given the scientific complexity associated with genomics, there is a growing recognition globally of the importance of science translation and community engagement for this type of research, as it creates the potential to build relationships, increase trust, improve consent processes and empower local communities. Despite this level of recognition, there is a lack of empirical evidence of the practise and processes for effective CE in genomic biobanking in Africa. To begin to address this vacuum, 17 in-depth face to face interviews were conducted with South African experts in genomic biobanking research and CE to provide insight into the process, benefits and challenges of CE in South Africa. Emerging themes were analysed using a contextualised thematic approach. Several themes emerged concerning the conduct of CE in genomic biobanking research in Africa. Although the literature tends to focus on the local community in CE, respondents in this study described three different layers of stakeholder engagement: community level, peer level and high level. Community level engagement includes potential participants, community advisory boards and field workers; peer level engagement includes researchers, biobankers and scientists, while high level engagement includes government officials, funders and policy makers. Although education of each stakeholder layer is important, education of the community layer can be most challenging, due to the complexity of the research and educational levels of stakeholders in this layer. CE is time-consuming and often requires an interdisciplinary research team approach. However careful planning of the engagement strategy, including an understanding of the differing layers of stakeholder engagement, and the specific educational needs at each layer, can help in the development of a relationship based on trust between the research team and various stakeholder groups. Since the community layer often comprises vulnerable populations in low and middle income countries, co-development of innovative educational tools on genomic biobanking is essential. CE is clearly a component of a broader process best described as stakeholder engagement.
Similar books and articles
Community engagement strategies for genomic studies in Africa: a review of the literature. [REVIEW]Paulina Tindana, Jantina de Vries, Megan Campbell, Katherine Littler, Janet Seeley, Patricia Marshall, Jennifer Troyer, Morisola Ogundipe, Vincent Pius Alibu, Aminu Yakubu & Michael Parker - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):24.
Community Members' Engagement with and Involvement in Genomic Research: Lessons to Learn from the Field.Morenike O. Folayan, Kolawole S. Oyedeji & Olawunmi A. Fatusi - 2015 - Developing World Bioethics 15 (1):1-7.
‘It Looks Like You Just Want Them When Things Get Rough’: Civil Society Perspectives on Negative Trial Results and Stakeholder Engagement in HIV Prevention Trials.Zaynab Essack Jennifer Koen - 2013 - Developing World Bioethics 13 (3):138-148.
'It Looks Like You Just Want Them When Things Get Rough': Civil Society Perspectives on Negative Trial Results and Stakeholder Engagement in HIV Prevention Trials.Jennifer Koen, Zaynab Essack, Catherine Slack, Graham Lindegger & Peter A. Newman - 2012 - Developing World Bioethics 12 (3):138-148.
“It’s all about trust”: reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.Keymanthri Moodley & Shenuka Singh - 2016 - BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):57.
Stakeholder engagement by South African businesses: Identification and prioritization of stakeholders.J. C. Mwangi, L. J. Vuuren & G. J. Rossouw - 2005 - African Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):39.
Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility.Michelle Greenwood - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 74 (4):315-327.
Experiences of community members and researchers on community engagement in an Ecohealth project in South Africa and Zimbabwe.Rosemary Musesengwa & Moses J. Chimbari - 2017 - BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1):76.
Students' Engagement with Engagement: The Case of Teacher Education Students in Higher Education in South Africa.Ruksana Osman & Nadine Petersen - 2010 - British Journal of Educational Studies 58 (4):407-419.
Motivations and perceptions of community advisory boards in the ethics of medical research: the case of the Thai-Myanmar border.Khin Maung Lwin, Phaik Y. Cheah, Phaik K. Cheah, Nicholas J. White, Nicholas P. J. Day, Francois Nosten & Michael Parker - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):12.
Stakeholder engagement by South African businesses: Identification and prioritization of stakeholders.J. C. Mwangi, L. J. van Vuuren & G. J. Rossouw - 2005 - African Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):39.
‘It is an entrustment’: Broad consent for genomic research and biobanks in Sub‐Saharan Africa.Paulina Tindana, Sassy Molyneux, Susan Bull & Michael Parker - 2017 - Developing World Bioethics.
The Principle of Good Faith: Toward Substantive Stakeholder Engagement.Cedric E. Dawkins - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 121 (2):1-13.
When Suits Meet Roots: The Antecedents and Consequences of Community Engagement Strategy. [REVIEW]Frances Bowen, Aloysius Newenham-Kahindi & Irene Herremans - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (2):297 - 318.
Corporate Citizenship and Stakeholder Engagement: Maintaining an Equitable Power Balance.Bethel Ihugba & Onyeka Osuji - 2011 - Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 16 (2):28-38.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
South Africa’s new standard material transfer agreement: proposals for improvement and pointers for implementation.Donrich W. Thaldar, Marietjie Botes & Annelize Nienaber - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-13.
Governing Gene Drive Technologies: A Qualitative Interview Study.N. de Graeff, Karin R. Jongsma, Jeantine E. Lunshof & Annelien L. Bredenoord - 2022 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 13 (2):107-124.
Researchers’ perspectives on return of individual genetics results to research participants: a qualitative study.Erisa Sabakaki Mwaka, Deborah Ekusai Sebatta, Joseph Ochieng, Ian Guyton Munabi, Godfrey Bagenda, Deborah Ainembabazi & David Kaawa-Mafigiri - 2021 - Global Bioethics 32 (1):15-33.
Study of laboratory staff’ knowledge of biobanking in Côte d’Ivoire.Ambroise Kouamé Kintossou, Mathias Kouamé N’dri, Marcelle Money, Souleymane Cissé, Simini Doumbia, Man-Koumba Soumahoro, Amadou Founzégué Coulibaly, Joseph Allico Djaman & Mireille Dosso - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-6.
Participant recall and understandings of information on biobanking and future genomic research: experiences from a multi-disease community-based health screening and biobank platform in rural South Africa.Janet Seeley, Emily B. Wong, Mark J. Siedner, Olivier Koole, Dickman Gareta, Resign Gunda, Dumsani Gumede, Nothando Ngwenya & Manono Luthuli - 2022 - BMC Medical Ethics 23 (1):1-11.
References found in this work
Seeking consent to genetic and genomic research in a rural Ghanaian setting: a qualitative study of the MalariaGEN experience. [REVIEW]P. Tindana, S. Bull, L. Amenga-Etego, J. Vries, R. Aborigo, K. Koram, D. Kwiatkowski & M. Parker - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):15-15.
Ethical issues in human genomics research in developing countries.Jantina de Vries, Susan J. Bull, Ogobara Doumbo, Muntaser Ibrahim, Odile Mercereau-Puijalon, Dominic Kwiatkowski & Michael Parker - 2011 - BMC Medical Ethics 12 (1):5.
Seeking consent to genetic and genomic research in a rural Ghanaian setting: A qualitative study of the MalariaGEN experience. [REVIEW]Paulina Tindana, Susan Bull, Lucas Amenga-Etego, Jantina de Vries, Raymond Aborigo, Kwadwo Koram, Dominic Kwiatkowski & Michael Parker - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):15-.
Obtaining informed consent for genomics research in Africa: analysis of H3Africa consent documents.Nchangwi Syntia Munung, Patricia Marshall, Megan Campbell, Katherine Littler, Francis Masiye, Odile Ouwe-Missi-Oukem-Boyer, Janet Seeley, D. J. Stein, Paulina Tindana & Jantina de Vries - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):132-137.
Community engagement and the human infrastructure of global health research.Katherine F. King, Pamela Kolopack, Maria W. Merritt & James V. Lavery - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):84.