The authorship list in science: Junior physicists' perceptions of who appears and why [Book Review]

Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):73-88 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A questionnaire probing the distribution of authorship credit was given to postdoctoral associates (“postdocs”) in order to determine their awareness of the professional society’s ethical statement on authorship, the extent of communication with their supervisors about authorship criteria, and the appropriateness of authorship assignments on submitted papers. Results indicate a low awareness of the professional society’s ethical statement and that little communication takes place between postdocs and supervisors about authorship criteria. A substantial amount of authorship credit given to supervisors and other workers is perceived by the postdocs to violate the professional society’s ethical statement.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Policies and perspectives on authorship.Mary Rose & Karla Fischer - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):361-370.
Graduate Students and the Culture of Authorship.Sarah E. Oberlander - 2006 - Ethics and Behavior 16 (3):217-232.
Criteria for Ethical Authorship and Contributorship.Charon A. Pierson - 2021 - In Deborah C. Poff & Alex C. Michalos (eds.), Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics. Springer Verlag. pp. 513-516.
Unethical Authorship Deals: Concepts, Challenges and Guidelines.Keshnee Padayachee - 2019 - In Nico Nortjé, Retha Visagie & J. S. Wessels (eds.), Social Science Research Ethics in Africa. Springer Verlag. pp. 103-115.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
30 (#550,897)

6 months
3 (#1,046,015)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?