Philosophy and Technology 34 (3):589-607 (2020)

Abstract
In a landmark essay, Andreas Matthias claimed that current developments in autonomous, artificially intelligent systems are creating a so-called responsibility gap, which is allegedly ever-widening and stands to undermine both the moral and legal frameworks of our society. But how severe is the threat posed by emerging technologies? In fact, a great number of authors have indicated that the fear is thoroughly instilled. The most pessimistic are calling for a drastic scaling-back or complete moratorium on AI systems, while the optimists aim to show that the gap can be bridged nonetheless. Contrary to both camps, I argue against the prevailing assumption that there is a technology-based responsibility gap. I show how moral responsibility is a dynamic and flexible process, one that can effectively encompass emerging technological entities.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2021
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s13347-020-00414-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,360
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Extended Mind.Andy Clark & David J. Chalmers - 1998 - Analysis 58 (1):7-19.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies.Nick Bostrom (ed.) - 2014 - Oxford University Press.

View all 54 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Experimental Philosophy of Technology.Steven R. Kraaijeveld - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology:1-20.
The Unfounded Bias Against Autonomous Weapons Systems.Áron Dombrovszki - 2021 - Információs Társadalom 21 (2):13–28.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Ties to Bind. Techno-Science, Ethics and Democracy.Kurasawa Fuyuki - 2004 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (2):159-186.
The Ties to Bind: Techno-Science, Ethics and Democracy.Fuyuki Kurasawa - 2004 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (2):159-186.
Techno-Anthropology.Galit Wellner, Lars Botin & Kathrin Otrel-Cass - 2015 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 19 (2):117-124.
On the Current Uses of Simondon’s Philosophy of Technology.Vincent Bontems - 2018 - In Bernadette Bensaude Vincent, Xavier Guchet & Sacha Loeve (eds.), French Philosophy of Technology: Classical Readings and Contemporary Approaches. Springer Verlag. pp. 37-49.
The Birth of Techno-Logos.Natalia Ortiz Maldonado & Gonzalo S. Aguirre - 2019 - Philosophy Today 63 (3):601-610.
Patočka on Techno-Science and Responsibility.Lubica Učník - 2007 - Studia Phaenomenologica 7:409-434.
Techno-Anthropology and Engineering Education: Between Hybridity and Social Responsibility.Tom Børsen & Lars Botin - 2015 - In Byron Newberry, Carl Mitcham, Martin Meganck, Andrew Jamison, Christelle Didier & Steen Hyldgaard Christensen (eds.), International Perspectives on Engineering Education. Springer Verlag.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-07-10

Total views
16 ( #643,022 of 2,448,862 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #82,723 of 2,448,862 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes