GM crops: Patently wrong? [Book Review]
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (3):261-283 (2007)
This paper focuses on the ethical justifiability of patents on Genetically Modified (GM) crops. I argue that there are three distinguishing features of GM crops that make it unethical to grant patents on GM crops, even if we assume that the patent system is in general justified. The first half of the paper critiques David Resnik’s recent arguments in favor of patents on GM crops. Resnik argues that we should take a consequentialist approach to the issue, and that the best way to do so is to apply the Precautionary Principle, and that the Precautionary Principle, in this case, supports patents on GM crops. I argue that his argument in favor of a consequentialist treatment is invalid; his Precautionary Principle in any case appears to be incompatible with consequentialism; and his conception of reasonable precautions is too ill-defined to have any argumentative purchase. In the second half of the paper, I argue against GM crop patents, on three grounds. First, there is insufficient evidence to say whether allowing patents on GM crops will make research go faster than not having patents, whilst there is a good reason to think that, other things being equal, a society that allows patents on GM crops will be less just than one that does not. Second, even assuming that patents on GM crops will increase the pace of GM crop research, there is no social need to do so. Third, patents on GM crops will frequently have ethically unacceptable side effects.
|Keywords||Consequentialism GM crops intellectual property precautionary principle tragedy of the anticommons|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality.Peter Railton - 1984 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (2):134-171.
Justifying Intellectual Property.Edwin C. Hettinger - 1989 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (1):31-52.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Well-Ordered Science: The Case of GM Crops.Matthew J. Lister - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research (Feb.):127-139.
Ethical Considerations at the Various Stages in the Development, Production, and Consumption of GM Crops.Michael J. Reiss - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):179-190.
Can Drug Patents Be Morally Justified?Sigrid Sterckx - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):81-92.
The Transatlantic Rift in Genetically Modified Food Policy.Celina Ramjoué - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):419-436.
Are Life Patents Ethical? Conflict Between Catholic Social Teaching and Agricultural Biotechnology's Patent Regime.Keith Douglass Warner - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):301-319.
Commercialization of Perennial GE Crops: Looming Challenges for Regulatory Frameworks. [REVIEW]V. Bagavathiannan Muthukumar, Spök Armin & C. Van Acker Rene - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3):227-242.
Ethical Discourse on the Use of Genetically Modified Crops: A Review of Academic Publications in the Fields of Ecology and Environmental Ethics. [REVIEW]Daniel Gregorowius, Petra Lindemann-Matthies & Markus Huppenbauer - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):265-293.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #117,339 of 2,163,896 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,100 of 2,163,896 )
How can I increase my downloads?