A legal case OWL ontology with an instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi

Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):83-107 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper provides an OWL ontology for legal cases with an instantiation of the legal case Popov v. Hayashi. The ontology makes explicit the conceptual knowledge of the legal case domain, supports reasoning about the domain, and can be used to annotate the text of cases, which in turn can be used to populate the ontology. A populated ontology is a case base which can be used for information retrieval, information extraction, and case based reasoning. The ontology contains not only elements for indexing the case (e.g. the parties, jurisdiction, and date), but as well elements used to reason to a decision such as argument schemes and the components input to the schemes. We use the Protégé ontology editor and knowledge acquisition system, current guidelines for ontology development, and tools for visual and linguistic presentation of the ontology

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An ontology in owl for legal case-based reasoning.Adam Wyner - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (4):361-387.
Representing Popov v Hayashi with dimensions and factors.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):15-35.
A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v Hayashi.Thomas F. Gordon & Douglas Walton - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):37-56.
Introduction to special issue on modelling Popov v. Hayashi.Katie Atkinson - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):1-14.
The Ontology of Thisness.Joseph Diekemper - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (1):49-71.
Commonsense causal explanation in a legal domain.Rinke Hoekstra & Joost Breuker - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (3):281-299.
Are mental events identical with brain events?Richard Swinburne - 1982 - American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (2):173-181.
The operator theory of instantiation.Peter Forrest - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):213 – 228.
Merging of legal micro-ontologies from european directives.Sylvie Despres & Sylvie Szulman - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (2):187-200.
Moral philosophy and the ontology of relations.Zoltan Balazs - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3):229-251.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-12-28

Downloads
87 (#194,552)

6 months
21 (#125,827)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Legal Argumentation and Evidence.Douglas N. Walton - 2002 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
The pleadings game.Thomas F. Gordon - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (4):239-292.
A note on dimensions and factors.Edwina L. Rissland & Kevin D. Ashley - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3):65-77.

View all 17 references / Add more references