From Stories—via Arguments, Scenarios, and Cases—to Probabilities: Commentary on Floris J. Bex's “The Hybrid Theory of Stories and Arguments Applied to the Simonshaven Case” and Bart Verheij's “Analyzing the Simonshaven Case With and Without Probabilities”

Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (4):1219-1223 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Topics in Cognitive Science, EarlyView.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/tops.12477

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Hybrid Theory of Stories and Arguments Applied to the Simonshaven Case.Floris J. Bex - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (4):1152-1174.
Analyzing the Simonshaven Case With and Without Probabilities.Bart Verheij - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (4):1175-1199.
Plausibility and Reasonable Doubt in the Simonshaven Case.Marcello Di Bello - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (4):1200-1204.
A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence.Floris J. Bex, Peter J. van Koppen, Henry Prakken & Bart Verheij - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (2):123-152.
Legal stories and the process of proof.Floris Bex & Bart Verheij - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (3):253-278.
Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments.F. J. Bex & V. M. Bex-Reimert - 2016 - Informal Logic 36 (3):349-370.
Accepting the truth of a story about the facts of a criminal case.Bart Verheij & Floris Bex - 2008 - In Hendrik Kaptein (ed.), Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic. Ashgate.
Proof with and without probabilities: Correct evidential reasoning with presumptive arguments, coherent hypotheses and degrees of uncertainty.Bart Verheij - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (1):127-154.
Arguments, stories and criminal evidence: A formal hybrid theory.Floris J. Bex - 2011 - Springer.
How Causal Probabilities Might Fit into Our Objectively Indeterministic World.Matthew Weiner & Nuel Belnap - 2006 - Synthese 149 (1):1-36.
Is hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence well suited for negative causation?Charles A. Barclay - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (3):361-384.
Three Doors, Two Players, and Single-Case Probabilities.Peter Baumann - 2005 - American Philosophical Quarterly 42 (1):71 - 79.
Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemes. [REVIEW]Floris Bex & Bart Verheij - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):325-353.
Analyzing stories using schemes.Floris Bex - 2008 - In Hendrik Kaptein (ed.), Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic. Ashgate.
Once upon an argument: Being the account of a dialogue between a poet and a philosopher, both ancient.Daniel H. Cohen & John Rosenwald - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-07

Downloads
8 (#1,315,307)

6 months
3 (#969,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frank Zenker
Nankai University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Analyzing the Simonshaven Case With and Without Probabilities.Bart Verheij - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (4):1175-1199.
Critical Thinking in the Intelligence Community: The Promise of Argument Mapping.Lawrence A. Lengbeyer - 2014 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 29 (2):14-34.

Add more references