11 found
Order:
  1.  66
    Saccadic Eye Movements and Cognition.Simon P. Liversedge & John M. Findlay - 2000 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (1):6-14.
  2. Encoding Multiple Words Simultaneously in Reading is Implausible.Erik D. Reichle, Simon P. Liversedge, Alexander Pollatsek & Keith Rayner - 2009 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (3):115-119.
    Several prominent models of reading posit that attention is distributed to support the parallel lexical processing of multiple words. We contend that the auxiliary assumptions underlying this attention-gradient hypothesis are not well founded. Here, we address three specific issues related to the ongoing debate about attention allocation during reading: (i) why the attention-gradient hypothesis is widely endorsed, (ii) why processing several words in parallel in reading is implausible and (iii) why attention must be allocated to only one word at a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3.  10
    Eye Movements of Second Language Learners When Reading Spaced and Unspaced Chinese Text.Deli Shen, Simon P. Liversedge, Jin Tian, Chuanli Zang, Lei Cui, Xuejun Bai, Guoli Yan & Keith Rayner - 2012 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 18 (2):192-202.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  55
    Beyond Isolated Word Recognition.Simon P. Liversedge, Hazel I. Blythe & Denis Drieghe - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):31-32.
    In this commentary we concur with Frost's view of the centrality of universal principles in models of word identification. However, we argue that other processes in sentence comprehension also fundamentally constrain the nature of written word identification. Furthermore, these processes appear to be universal. We, therefore, argue that universality in word identification should not be considered in isolation, but instead in the context of other linguistic processes that occur during normal reading.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  9
    Parafoveal Previews and Lexical Frequency in Natural Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements and Fixation-Related Potentials.Federica Degno, Otto Loberg, Chuanli Zang, Manman Zhang, Nick Donnelly & Simon P. Liversedge - 2019 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 148 (3):453-474.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  29
    Children's Comprehension of Sentences with Focus Particles.Kevin B. Paterson, Simon P. Liversedge, Caroline Rowland & Ruth Filik - 2003 - Cognition 89 (3):263-294.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  7
    Search for Two Categories of Target Produces Fewer Fixations to Target-Color Items.Tamaryn Menneer, Michael J. Stroud, Kyle R. Cave, Xingshan Li, Hayward J. Godwin, Simon P. Liversedge & Nick Donnelly - 2012 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 18 (4):404-418.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  8
    Individual Differences in Search and Monitoring for Color Targets in Dynamic Visual Displays.Alex Muhl-Richardson, Hayward J. Godwin, Matthew Garner, Julie A. Hadwin, Simon P. Liversedge & Nick Donnelly - 2018 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 24 (4):564-577.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  17
    Universality in Eye Movements and Reading: A Trilingual Investigation.Simon P. Liversedge, Denis Drieghe, Xin Li, Guoli Yan, Xuejun Bai & Jukka Hyönä - 2016 - Cognition 147:1-20.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  6
    The FVF Framework and Target Prevalence Effects.Tamaryn Menneer, Hayward J. Godwin, Simon P. Liversedge, Anne P. Hillstrom, Valerie Benson, Erik D. Reichle & Nick Donnelly - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  23
    Psycholinguistic Processes Affect Fixation Durations and Orthographic Information Affects Fixation Locations: Can E-Z Reader Cope?Simon P. Liversedge & Sarah J. White - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):492-493.
    This commentary focuses on two aspects of eye movement behaviour that E-Z Reader 7 currently makes no attempt to explain: the influence of higher order psycholinguistic processes on fixation durations, and orthographic influences on initial and refixation locations on words. From our understanding of the current version of the model, it is not clear how it may be readily modified to account for existing empirical data.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark