David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):13-37 (2010)
What does Husserlian phenomenology have to offer feminist theory? More specifically, can we find resources within Husserl’s account of the living body ( Leib ) for the critical feminist project of rethinking embodiment beyond the dichotomies not only of mind/body but also of subject/object and activity/passivity? This essay begins by explicating the reasons for feminist hesitation with respect to Husserlian phenomenology. I then explore the resources that Husserl’s phenomenology of touch and his account of sensings hold for feminist theory. My reading of Husserl proceeds by means of a comparison between his description of touch in Ideas II and Merleau-Ponty’s early appropriation of this account in the Phenomenology of Perception, as well as through an unlikely rapprochement between Husserl and Irigaray on the question of touch. Moreover, by revisiting the limitations in Husserl’s approach to the body—limitations of which any feminist appropriation must remain cognizant—I attempt to take Husserl’s phenomenology of touch beyond its initial methodologically solipsistic frame and to ask whether and how it can contribute to thinking gendered and racialized bodies. The phenomenology of touch, I argue, can allow us to understand the interplay between subjective, felt embodiment and social-historical context. In opening up Husserl’s account of touch to other dimensions—intersubjective and affective—sociality is revealed as residing within, and structuring of, touch. Such touch can allow us to think embodiment anew.
|Keywords||Husserl Feminism Body Touch Sensings Affectivity Sociality Gender Activity/passivity Subject/object|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Sara Ahmed (2006). Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Duke University Press.
Alia Al-Saji (2000). The Site of Affect in Husserl’s Phenomenology: Sensations and the Constitution of the Lived Body. Philosophy Today 44 (Supplement):51-59.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ryan Hickerson (2009). Neglecting the Question of Being: Heidegger's Argument Against Husserl. Inquiry 52 (6):574 – 595.
Paul Ricœur (1967/2007). Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Marcus Brainard (2007). “For a New World”: On the Practical Impulse of Husserlian Theory. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 23 (1):17–31.
Sebastian Luft (2011). Subjectivity and Lifeworld in Transcendental Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Raymond J. Devettere (1973). Merleau-Ponty and the Husserlian Reductions. Philosophy Today 17 (4):297-308.
Jeffrey Yoshimi (2007). Mathematizing Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (3):271-291.
Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson (2011). Feminist Phenomenology and the Woman in the Running Body. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (3):297 - 313.
Robin Durie (2008). At the Same Time. Continental Philosophy Review 41 (1):73-88.
Antonio Zirión (2000). Phenomenology in Mexico: A Historical Profile. Continental Philosophy Review 33 (1):75-92.
Filip Mattens (2009). Perception, Body, and the Sense of Touch: Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 25 (2):97-120.
Added to index2010-04-17
Total downloads91 ( #13,633 of 1,102,738 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,741 of 1,102,738 )
How can I increase my downloads?