David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 2:357-386 (2006)
Predication is an indisputable part of our linguistic behavior. By contrast, the metaphysics of predication has been a matter of dispute ever since antiquity. According to Plato—or at least Platonism, the view that goes by Plato’s name in contemporary philosophy—the truths expressed by predications such as “Socrates is wise” are true because there is a subject of predication (e.g., Socrates), there is an abstract property or universal (e.g., wisdom), and the subject exemplifies the property.1 This view is supposed to be general, applying to all predications, whether the subject of predication is a person, a planet, or a property.2 Despite the controversy surrounding the metaphysics of predication, many theistic philosophers—including the majority of contemporary analytic theists—regard Platonism as extremely attractive. At the same time, however, such philosophers are also commonly attracted to a form of traditional theism that has at its core the thesis that God is an absolutely independent..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jacobus Erasmus & Anné Hendrik Verhoef (2015). The Kalām Cosmological Argument and the Infinite God Objection. Sophia 54 (4):411-427.
Paul Gould (2013). How Does an Aristotelian Substance Have its Platonic Properties? Issues and Options. Axiomathes 23 (2):343-364.
Yann Schmitt (2013). The Deadlock of Absolute Divine Simplicity. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):117-130.
Joseph Stenberg (2014). Divine Properties, Parts, and Parity. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 75 (5):388-405.
Similar books and articles
Øystein Linnebo (2008). The Nature of Mathematical Objects. In Bonnie Gold & Roger Simons (eds.), Proof and Other Dilemmas: Mathematics and Philosophy. Mathematical Association of America 205--219.
Mark Balaguer, Platonism in Metaphysics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Jeffrey E. Brower (2009). Simplicity and Aseity. In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press 105-28.
Mark Balaguer (1998). Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
Daniel Nolan (2008). Truthmakers and Predication. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 4:171-192.
Francis Jeffry Pelletier & Edward N. Zalta (2000). How to Say Goodbye to the Third Man. Noûs 34 (2):165–202.
Daniel A. Dombrowski (2006). Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. Cambridge University Press.
Brian Leftow (1990). Is God an Abstract Object? Noûs 24 (4):581-598.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads219 ( #10,974 of 1,790,408 )
Recent downloads (6 months)62 ( #15,432 of 1,790,408 )
How can I increase my downloads?