Truth and error in Aristotle's theory of sense perception

Philosophical Quarterly 11 (42):1-9 (1961)
Why does aristotle say that the common sensibles are susceptible to error while the specific sensibles are not? various solutions of this problem are discussed and finally it is concluded that aristotle's meaning here is teleological. The specific senses were fashioned by nature to perceive the specific sensibles but not the common sensibles and so error sometimes (often) creeps in. The common sense is really not a sense faculty as the eye, The ear etc
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2216674
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,201
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Stephen Gaukroger (1995). The ten Modes of Aenesidemus and the Myth of Ancient Scepticism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3 (2):371 – 387.
Stephen Gaukroger (1981). Aristotle on the Function of Sense Perception. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 12 (1):75-89.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

77 ( #61,540 of 1,940,944 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #225,765 of 1,940,944 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.