Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Quarterly 11 (42):1-9 (1961)
|Abstract||Why does aristotle say that the common sensibles are susceptible to error while the specific sensibles are not? various solutions of this problem are discussed and finally it is concluded that aristotle's meaning here is teleological. The specific senses were fashioned by nature to perceive the specific sensibles but not the common sensibles and so error sometimes (often) creeps in. The common sense is really not a sense faculty as the eye, The ear etc|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paolo Crivelli (2004). Aristotle on Truth. Cambridge University Press.
Stephen Everson (1997). Aristotle on Perception. Oxford University Press.
Howard M. Robinson (1994). Perception. New York: Routledge.
Walter A. Brogan (2002). Gadamer's Praise of Theory: Aristotle's Friend and the Reciprocity Between Theory and Practice. Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):141-155.
T. K. Johansen (1997). Aristotle on the Sense-Organs. Cambridge University Press.
Richard Joyce (2011). The Error In 'The Error In The Error Theory'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):519-534.
Tim Crane, The Problem of Perception. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Keya Maitra (2002). Leibniz's Account of Error. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):63 – 73.
J. A. Towey (1999). Aristotle on the Sense Organs (Review). [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 119:192-193.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads48 ( #26,643 of 739,537 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,464 of 739,537 )
How can I increase my downloads?