Animal breeding in the age of biotechnology: the investigative pathway behind the cloning of Dolly the sheep

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 37 (3):282-304 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper addresses the 1996 cloning of Dolly the sheep, locating it within a long-standing tradition of animal breeding research in Edinburgh. Far from being an end in itself, the cell-nuclear transfer experiment from which Dolly was born should be seen as a step in an investigative pathway that sought the production of medically relevant transgenic animals. By historicising Dolly, I illustrate how the birth of this sheep captures a dramatic redefinition of the life sciences, when in the 1970s and 1980s the rise of neo-liberal governments and the emergence of the biotechnology market pushed research institutions to show tangible applications of their work. Through this broader interpretative framework, the Dolly story emerges as a case study of the deep transformations of agricultural experimentation during the last third of the twentieth century. The reorganisation of laboratory practice, human resources and institutional settings required by the production of transgenic animals had unanticipated consequences. One of these unanticipated effects was that the boundaries between animal and human health became blurred. As a result of this, new professional spaces emerged and the identity of Dolly the sheep was reconfigured, from an instrument for livestock improvement in the farm to a more universal symbol of the new cloning age.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dolly: a New Form of Transgenic Breedwealth.Clare Palmer - 1997 - Environmental Values 6 (4):427-437.
Dolly: a New Form of Transgenic Breedwealth.Sarah Franklin - 1997 - Environmental Values 6 (4):427 - 437.
Cloning humans from the perspective of the Christian churches.R. Cole-Turner - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):33-46.
Cloning After Dolly: Who's Still Afraid?Gregory E. Pence - 2004 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Mom, Dad, Clone: Implications for Reproductive Privacy.Lori B. Andrews - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (2):176-186.
'Crook' pipettes: embryonic emigrations from agriculture to reproductive biomedicine.Sarah Franklin - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):358-373.
A wolf in sheep’s cloning?Richard Hanley - 1999 - Monash Bioethics Review 18 (1):59-62.
On Cloning: Advocating History of Biology in the Public Interest. [REVIEW]Jane Maienschein - 2001 - Journal of the History of Biology 34 (3):423 - 432.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-05

Downloads
23 (#675,507)

6 months
8 (#350,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

The work of the Animal Research Station, Cambridge.Chris Polge - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):511-520.

View all 44 references / Add more references