Graduate studies at Western
Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (4):530-547 (2008)
|Abstract||There are many examples in the literature that suggest that indistinguishability is intransitive, despite the fact that the indistinguishability relation is typically taken to be an equivalence relation (and thus transitive). It is shown that if the uncertainty perception and the question of when an agent reports that two things are indistinguishable are both carefully modeled, the problems disappear, and indistinguishability can indeed be taken to be an equivalence relation. Moreover, this model also suggests a logic of vagueness that seems to solve many of the problems related to vagueness discussed in the philosophical literature. In particular, it is shown here how the logic can handle the sorites paradox|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Matti Eklund (2005). What Vagueness Consists In. Philosophical Studies 125 (1):27-60.
Maureen Donnelly (2009). Mereological Vagueness and Existential Vagueness. Synthese 168 (1):53 - 79.
Terence Horgan (1998). The Transvaluationist Conception of Vagueness. The Monist 81 (2):313-330.
Ebbe Groes, Hans JØrgen Jacobsen, Birgitte Sloth & Torben Tranæs (1999). Testing the Intransitivity Explanation of the Allais Paradox. Theory and Decision 47 (3):229-245.
Trenton Merricks (2001). Varieties of Vagueness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):145-157.
Jonathan Aldred (2007). Intransitivity and Vague Preferences. Journal of Ethics 11 (4):377 - 403.
Paul Égré & Denis Bonnay (2010). Vagueness, Uncertainty and Degrees of Clarity. Synthese 174 (1):47 - 78.
Joseph Y. Halpern (2009). Intransitivity and Vagueness - Corrigendum. Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (3):591-591.
Added to index2009-03-19
Total downloads15 ( #86,109 of 740,467 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?