- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Einstein and bell: Strengthening the case for microphysical randomness
Synthese 53 (3):445 - 460 (1982)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
What is Einstein's statistical interpretation, or, is it Einstein for whom bell's theorem tolls?Arthur Fine - 1984 - Topoi 3 (1):23-36.
Randomness Is Unpredictability.Antony Eagle - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):749-790.
Incompleteness, complexity, randomness and beyond.Cristian S. Calude - 2002 - Minds and Machines 12 (4):503-517.
Lowness and $\Pi _{2}^{0}$ Nullsets.Rod Downey, Andre Nies, Rebecca Weber & Liang Yu - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (3):1044 - 1052.
How to (properly) strengthen Bell's theorem using counterfactuals.Tomasz Bigaj - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (1):58-66.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
74 (#219,765)
6 months
10 (#255,790)
2009-01-28
Downloads
74 (#219,765)
6 months
10 (#255,790)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Stochastic Einstein-locality and the bell theorems.Geoffrey Hellman - 1982 - Synthese 53 (3):461 - 504.
For whom the bell arguments toll.James Hawthorne & Michael Silberstein - 1995 - Synthese 102 (1):99-138.
Bell's inequalities, relativistic quantum field theory and the problem of hidden variables.Miklós Rédei - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (4):628-638.
Is algebraic lorentz-covariant quantum field theory stochastic Einstein local?F. A. Muller & Jeremy Butterfield - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (3):457-474.
Interpretations of Probability in Quantum Mechanics: A Case of “Experimental Metaphysics”.Geoffrey Hellman - 2009 - In Wayne C. Myrvold & Joy Christian (eds.), Quantum Reality, Relativistic Causality, and Closing the Epistemic Circle. Springer. pp. 211--227.
References found in this work
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox.J. S. Bell - 2004 [1964] - In Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 14--21.
Deterministic theories.Richard Montague - 1974 - In Richmond H. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy. Yale University Press.
Logic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics.Patrick Suppes (ed.) - 1976 - Dordrecht and Boston: Springer.
Stochastic Einstein-locality and the bell theorems.Geoffrey Hellman - 1982 - Synthese 53 (3):461 - 504.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-nx2x8 uwo