History and Philosophy of Logic 5 (2):177-194 (1984)
|Abstract||Dummett's case against platonism rests on arguments concerning the acquisition and manifestation of knowledge of meaning. Dummett's arguments are here criticized from a viewpoint less Davidsonian than Chomskian. Dummett's case against formalism is obscure because in its prescriptive considerations are not clearly separated from descriptive. Dummett's implicit value judgments are here made explicit and questioned. ?Combat Revisionism!? Chairman Mao|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ofra Magidor (2007). Strict Finitism Refuted? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107 (1pt3):403-411.
Alexander George (1988). Intuitionism, Excluded Middle and Decidability: A Response to Weir on Dummett: A Response to Weir on Dummett. Mind 97 (388):597-602.
Anat Matar (1997). From Dummett's Philosophical Perspective. W. De Gruyter.
Benjamin Murphy, Michael Dummett. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Richard Heck (2007). Use and Meaning. In R. E. Auxier & L. E. Hahn (eds.), The Philosophy of Michael Dummett.
Timothy Williamson (1998). Indefinite Extensibility. Grazer Philosophische Studien 55:1-24.
Richard Tieszen (2000). Intuitionism, Meaning Theory and Cognition. History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (3):179-194.
Cheng-Hung Tsai (2003). Dummett's Notion of Implicit Knowledge. Philosophical Writings 24:17-35.
Jan Dejnožka (2010). Dummett's Forward Road to Frege and to Intuitionism. Diametros 25:118-131.
Samuel William Mitchell (1992). Dummett's Intuitionism is Not Strict Finitism. Synthese 90 (3):437 - 458.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads28 ( #44,113 of 549,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #12,390 of 549,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?