Dummett's case for intuitionism

History and Philosophy of Logic 5 (2):177-194 (1984)
Dummett's case against platonism rests on arguments concerning the acquisition and manifestation of knowledge of meaning. Dummett's arguments are here criticized from a viewpoint less Davidsonian than Chomskian. Dummett's case against formalism is obscure because in its prescriptive considerations are not clearly separated from descriptive. Dummett's implicit value judgments are here made explicit and questioned. ?Combat Revisionism!? Chairman Mao
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/01445348408837069
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,914
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Mark Greenberg & Gilbert Harman (2007). Conceptual Role Semantics. In Ernest LePore & Barry Smith (eds.), Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. Oxford University Press 242-256.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Mihai Ganea (2008). Epistemic Optimism. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (3):333-353.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

41 ( #80,753 of 1,725,584 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,436 of 1,725,584 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.