David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Teaching Philosophy 22 (1):53-76 (1999)
This paper exposits and defends the ideas of Marie de Gournay , a Parisian essayist and literary critic. Reading her as an early feminist, the author argues that Gournay’s work merits far more attention than it has received, especially her arguments which track the social formation of sex, her conscious opposition to male defamation of and mistreatment of women, and her appreciation of how male misogyny reflects the social privilege of the men who advance it. Gournay’s true genius, however, lies in her argumentative method. Her goal is to get women to break the habit of deferring to men’s opinions about women and women’s experience. To do this, however, Gournay must first authorize her own arguments within a misogynist context and thus deploys the argumentative strategy of first appealing to socially sanctioned authorities to argue her points. Having framed Gournay’s work in these terms, the author considers several of Gournay’s interpretations of canonical figures, replies to contemporary critics of Gournay, and concludes by discussing the inclusion of Gournay’s work in an early modern Western philosophy course
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Marguerite Deslauriers (2008). Marie de Gournay and Montaigne. Angelaki 13 (2):5 – 15.
Karen Green (2013). Women's Writing and the Early Modern Genre Wars. Hypatia 28 (3):499-515.
Eileen O'Neill (2007). Justifying the Inclusion of Women in Our Histories of Philosophy: The Case of Marie de Gournay. In Linda Alcoff & Eva Feder Kittay (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Feminist Philosophy. Blackwell Pub.
Jean-Marie Le Bars (2000). Counterexamples of the 0-1 Law for Fragments of Existential Second-Order Logic: An Overview. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (1):67 - 82.
Luna Nàjera (1999). Engendering Ethnicity. Radical Philosophy Review 2 (2):112-122.
Harry Brighouse (2007). Equality of Opportunity and Complex Equality: The Special Place of Schooling. [REVIEW] Res Publica 13 (2):147-158.
Carina Fourie (2012). What is Social Equality? An Analysis of Status Equality as a Strongly Egalitarian Ideal. Res Publica 18 (2):107-126.
Madison Powers (1996). Forget About Equality. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):129-144.
Roger Fjellstrom (2002). Equality Does Not Entail Equality Across Species. Environmental Ethics 24 (4):339-352.
Prof Laurence Thomas (2003). Upside-Down Equality: A Response to Kantian Thought. In [Book Chapter] (in Press).
Todd May (2009). Democracy is Where We Make It. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 13 (1):3-21.
Martin W. Bunder, J. Roger Hindley & Jonathan P. Seldin (1989). On Adding (Ξ) to Weak Equality in Combinatory Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (2):590-607.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads19 ( #203,297 of 1,911,616 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #179,609 of 1,911,616 )
How can I increase my downloads?