David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Husserl Studies 22 (2):121-135 (2006)
The problem of distinguishing between willing and wishing and their significance for both the constitution of our consciousness as well as the constitution of our practical life runs all the way through the history of philosophy. Given the persuasiveness of the problem, it might be helpful to draw a sharp distinction between a metaphysical and a psychological or phenomenological approach to the problem. The first approach may be identified with the positions that Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche held, which involved an identification of the will with reality/actuality in general, and which Heidegger tried to analyze in his later writings on the basis of his confrontation with Nietzsche. In this paper, however, I will not consider the metaphysical approach to the distinction; rather, I will focus on the second approach to distinguishing wishing and willing, which was initiated by Aristotle in his Nicomachean Ethics, and of which as we will see soon – Husserl and the early Heidegger are ultimately still heirs. Hence I will begin my consideration by recalling briefly the main claim in Aristotle’s discovery of the central position of will within our life.
|Keywords||willing wishing practical life Husserl Heidegger Phenomenology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ullrich Melle (1988). Zu Brentanos und Husserls Ethikansatz. Die Analogie zwischen den Vernunftarten. Brentano Studien 1:109-120.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Ricœur (1967). Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Christian Lotz (2007). From Affectivity to Subjectivity: Husserl's Phenomenology Revisited. Palgrave Macmillan.
Paul Gorner (2002). Heidegger's Phenomenology as Transcendental Philosophy. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):17 – 33.
Sebastian Luft (2005). Husserl's Concept of the 'Transcendental Person': Another Look at the Husserl-Heidegger Relationship. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (2):141-177.
Dermot Moran (2007). Fink's Speculative Phenomenology: Between Constitution and Transcendence. Research in Phenomenology 37 (1):3-31.
Burt Hopkins (2001). The Husserl-Heidegger Confrontation and the Essential Possibility of Phenomenology: Edmund Husserl, Psychological and Transcendental Phenomenology and the Confrontation with Heidegger. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 17 (2):125-148.
Ryan Hickerson (2009). Neglecting the Question of Being: Heidegger's Argument Against Husserl. Inquiry 52 (6):574 – 595.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #110,871 of 1,932,462 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #225,373 of 1,932,462 )
How can I increase my downloads?