Graduate studies at Western
Mind and Language 18 (3):296-315 (2003)
|Abstract||Among theory theorists, it is commonly thought that folk psychological theory is tacitly known. However, folk psychological knowledge has none of the central features of tacit knowledge. But if it is ordinary knowledge, why is it that we have difficulties expressing anything but a handful of folk psychological generalisations? The reason is that our knowledge is of theoretical models and hypotheses, not of universal generalisations. Adopting this alternative view of (scientific) theories, we come to see that, given time and reflection, we can say what we know|
|Keywords||Epistemology Folk Psychology Tacit Knowledge Theory Chomsky, N|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John J. Haldane (1988). Folk Psychology and the Explanation of Human Behaviour: Understanding Folk. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 223:223-254.
Haidi L. Maibom (2007). Social Systems. Philosophical Psychology 20:1-22.
John J. Haldane (1988). Understanding Folk. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 62:222-46.
Ian Ravenscroft, Folk Psychology as a Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Heidi L. Maibom (2007). Social Systems. Philosophical Psychology 20 (5):557 – 578.
Martin J. Pickering & Nick Chater (1995). Why Cognitive Science is Not Formalized Folk Psychology. Minds and Machines 5 (3):309-337.
Martin Davies & Tony Stone (2001). Mental Simulation, Tacit Theory, and the Threat of Collapse. Philosophical Topics 29 (1-2):127-73.
G. Fletcher (1995). Two Uses of Folk Psychology: Implications for Psychological Science. Philosophical Psychology 8 (3):375-88.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #44,895 of 740,000 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,423 of 740,000 )
How can I increase my downloads?