Philosophical Studies 138 (2):245-269 (2008)
|Abstract||This paper examines three accounts of the sleeping beauty case: an account proposed by Adam Elga, an account proposed by David Lewis, and a third account defended in this paper. It provides two reasons for preferring the third account. First, this account does a good job of capturing the temporal continuity of our beliefs, while the accounts favored by Elga and Lewis do not. Second, Elga’s and Lewis’ treatments of the sleeping beauty case lead to highly counterintuitive consequences. The proposed account also leads to counterintuitive consequences, but they’re not as bad as those of Elga’s account, and no worse than those of Lewis’ account.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter J. Lewis (2010). Credence and Self-Location. Synthese 175:369-382.
Cian Dorr (2002). Sleeping Beauty: In Defence of Elga. Analysis 62 (4):292–296.
Daniel Peterson (2011). Qeauty and the Books: A Response to Lewis's Quantum Sleeping Beauty Problem. Synthese 181 (3):367-374.
David Papineau & Víctor Durà-Vilà (2009). A Thirder and an Everettian: A Reply to Lewis's 'Quantum Sleeping Beauty'. Analysis 69 (1):78-86.
David Lewis (2001). Sleeping Beauty: Reply to Elga. Analysis 61 (3):171–76.
Joel Pust (2008). Horgan on Sleeping Beauty. Synthese 160 (1):97 - 101.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads89 ( #7,919 of 549,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #3,666 of 549,198 )
How can I increase my downloads?