Controversy Spaces: A Model of Scientific and Philosophical Change

(ed.)
John Benjamins (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

chapter 7. How DNA became an important molecule: Controversies at the origins of molecular biology Eleonora Cresto José María Gil Contributors Author index ...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Call number

B53.C556 2011

ISBN(s)

9027284849   9027218900   9789027218902   9789027284846
View all bargains

Buy this book

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Chapters

A brief history of supervenience in the controversy space of recent philosophy of mind.Diana Pérez
Historiographic refocalization and change in the historicity regime.Francisco Naishtat
Jacques Rohault's system of natural philosophy.Laura Benítez Grobet
The development of 20th-century American linguistics as a controversy space.José María Gil
The problem of irreversibility, from Fourier to Chaos theory.Olimpia Lombardi
The relation between Chemistry and Physics.Martín Labarca
Controversy Spaces: The Dialectical Nature of Change in the Sciences and Philosophy.  (pages 10--9)Oscar Nudler
How DNA became an important molecule Controversies at the origins of molecular biology.  (pages 10--135)Eleonora Cresto
How DNA became an important molecule.  (pages 14)Eleonora Cresto
Iacques Rohault's system of natural philosophy History of.  (pages 123)Laura Benitez Grobet
The development of 20th-century American.  (pages 163)Iosé Maria Gil

Similar books and articles

Kitcher's compromise: A critical examination of the compromise model of scientific closure, and its implications for the relationship between history and philosophy of science.Timothy Shanahan - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (2):319-338.
Descartes as critic of Galileo's scientific methodology.Roger Ariew - 1986 - Synthese 67 (1):77 - 90.
Philosophy of science and historical enquiry.John Losee - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Evolutionary analogies: is the process of scientific change analogous to the organic change?Barbara Gabriella Renzi - 2011 - Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press. Edited by Giulio Napolitano.
Switching gestalts on gestalt psychology: On the relation between science and philosophy.Jordi Cat - 2007 - Perspectives on Science 15 (2):131-177.
Bioethics and history.Robert Baker - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (4):447 – 474.
“Muckraking in History”: The Role of the History of Science in Kuhn's Philosophy.Bojana Mladenović - 2007 - Perspectives on Science 15 (3):261-294.
Barriers and Models: Comments on Margolis and Giere.Nancy J. Nersessian - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:441 - 444.
Physics and metaphysics: theories of space and time.Jennifer Trusted - 1991 - New York: Routledge.
A preliminary discourse on the study of natural philosophy.John F. W. Herschel - 1830 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Is the philosophy of science scientific?A. Cornelius Benjamin - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (4):351-358.
Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science.Michael R. Matthews - 1994 - Routledge.
Why Does History Matter to Philosophy and the Sciences?: Selected Essays.Lorenz Krüger, Thomas Sturm, Wolfgang Carl & Lorraine Daston (eds.) - 2005 - Walter DeGruyter.
Hidden entities and experimental practice: Towards a two-way traffic between history and philosophy of science.Theodore Arabatzis - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-06-24

Downloads
26 (#606,277)

6 months
4 (#779,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references