David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Walter DeGruyter (2005)
What are the relationships between philosophy and the history of philosophy, the history of science and the philosophy of science? This selection of essays by Lorenz Krüger (1932-1994) presents exemplary studies on the philosophy of John Locke and Immanuel Kant, on the history of physics and on the scope and limitations of scientific explanation, and a realistic understanding of science and truth. In his treatment of leading currents in 20th century philosophy, Krüger presents new and original arguments for a deeper understanding of the continuity and dynamics of the development of scientific theory. These result in significant consequences for the claim of the sciences that they understand reality in a rational manner. The case studies are complemented by fundamental thoughts on the relationship between philosophy, science, and their common history.
|Keywords||Lorenz Krüger History of Philosophy History of Science History and Philosophy of Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Uljana Feest & Thomas Sturm (2011). What (Good) is Historical Epistemology? Editors' Introduction. Erkenntnis 75 (3):285-302.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Sturm, Wolfgang Carl & Lorraine Daston (2005). Why Does History Matter to Philosophy and the Sciences? Editor's Introduction. In Thomas Sturm, Wolfgang Carl & Lorraine Daston (eds.), Why does history matter to philosophy and the sciences? De Gruyter
Lorenz Krüger (1980). Intertheoretic Relations as a Tool for the Rational Reconstruction of Scientific Development. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 11 (2):89-101.
John Losee (1987). Philosophy of Science and Historical Enquiry. Oxford University Press.
Friedrich Steinle (1995). Lorenz Krüger 3. Oktober 1932–29. September 1994. NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine 3 (1):57-58.
Franccsca di Poppa (2001). Rational Reconstructions Revised. Theoria 16 (3):461-480.
Mordechai Feingold, Joseph S. Freedman & Wolfgang Rother (eds.) (2001). The Influence of Petrus Ramus: Studies in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Philosophy and Sciences. Schwabe & Co..
Peter Machamer & Franccsca Di Poppa (2001). Rational Reconstructions Revised. Theoria 16 (3):461-480.
Taner Edis (2006). Science and Nonbelief. Greenwood Press.
Krzysztof Brzechczyn (2009). Between Science and Literature: The Debate on the Status of History. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 97 (1):7-30.
John F. W. Herschel (1830/1987). A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
Roger Ariew (1986). Descartes as Critic of Galileo's Scientific Methodology. Synthese 67 (1):77 - 90.
John Norton (1986). Comment on Lorenz Kruger, "Probability as a Theoretical Concept in Physics". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:288 - 291.
William Krieger (ed.) (2011). Science at the Frontiers: Perspectives on the History and Philosophy of Science. Lexington Books.
Theo J. Kalikow (1975). History of Konrad Lorenz's Ethological Theory, 1927–1939 The Role of Meta-Theory, Theory, Anomaly and New Discoveries in a Scientific 'Evolution'. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 6 (4):331-341.
Added to index2011-11-01
Total downloads97 ( #35,110 of 1,780,850 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #166,218 of 1,780,850 )
How can I increase my downloads?