Erkenntnis 50 (1):91-121 (1999)
|Abstract||In this paper I discuss Newton's first optical paper. My aim is to examine the type of argument which Newton uses in order to convince his readers of the truth of his theory of colors. My claim is that this argument is an induction by elimination, and that the Newtonian method of justification is a kind of generative justification, a term due to T. Nickles. To achieve my aim I analyze in some detail the arguments in Newton's first optical paper, relating the paper with Newton's other writings in optics, and especially his early correspondence in defence of his theory of colors.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edward Slowik (2009). Newton's Metaphysics of Space: A “Tertium Quid” Betwixt Substantivalism and Relationism, or Merely a “God of the (Rational Mechanical) Gaps”? Perspectives on Science 17 (4):pp. 429-456.
Alan E. Shapiro (2008). Twenty-Nine Years in the Making: Newton's Opticks. Perspectives on Science 16 (4):pp. 417-438.
B. E. (2003). The Newtonian Myth. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (4):763-780.
Nick Huggett (2000). Reflections on Parity Nonconservation. Philosophy of Science 67 (2):219-241.
Katherine Dunlop (2012). The Mathematical Form of Measurement and the Argument for Proposition I in Newton's Principia. Synthese 186 (1):191-229.
Mary Domski (2010). Newton's Empiricism and Metaphysics. Philosophy Compass 5 (7):525-534.
Quayshawn Spencer (2004). Do Newton's Rules of Reasoning Guarantee Truth ... Must They? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35 (4):759-782.
Fokko Jan Dijksterhuis (2008). Reading Up on the Opticks. Refashioning Newton's Theories of Light and Colors in Eighteenth-Century Textbooks. Perspectives on Science 16 (4):pp. 309-327.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #161,910 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?