Reassessing the Reliability of Advance Directives

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (3):325 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A competent patient has the right to refuse treatment necessary to sustain life. However, for many end-of-life decisions, we lack direct access to the wishes of a competent patient. Some treatment decisions near the end of life involve patients with severely diminished mental capacity, some involve patients who are unable to communicate, and some involve patients who are simply unable or unwilling to participate in decisionmaking due to the nature or severity of their illness

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Advance Directives and Personal Identity: What Is the Problem?E. Furberg - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):60-73.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
45 (#350,446)

6 months
9 (#299,238)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Living wills and substituted judgments: A critical analysis.Jos V. M. Welie - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):169-183.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ulysses and the Sirens.Jon Elster - 1986 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (1):82-95.
Practical Reason and Norms.C. H. Whiteley - 1976 - Philosophical Quarterly 26 (104):287-288.
The Many Faces of Competency.James F. Drane - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 15 (2):17-21.
Advance directives and the personal identity problem.Allen Buchanan - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (4):277-302.

View all 11 references / Add more references