David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (1):53-83 (2012)
One of the most oft-cited parts of Francis Hutcheson’s Illustrations upon the Moral Sense (1728) is his discussion of “exciting reasons.” In this paper I address the question: What is the function of that discussion? In particular, what is its relation to Hutcheson’s attempt to show that the rationalists’ normative thesis ultimately implies, contrary to their moral epistemology, that moral ideas spring from a sense? Despite first appearances, Hutcheson’s discussion of exciting reasons is not part of that attempt. Mainly, it is part of Hutcheson’s comeback to Gilbert Burnet’s objections to Hutcheson’s Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue (1725).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Patricia Sheridan (2007). The Metaphysical Morality of Francis Hutcheson: A Consideration of Hutcheson's Critique of Moral Fitness Theory. Sophia 46 (3):263-275.
Susan M. Purviance (2002). Ethical Externalism and the Moral Sense. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:585-600.
Douglas R. Paletta (2011). Francis Hutcheson: Why Be Moral? Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (2):149-159.
Francis Hutcheson (1769). An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections with Illustrations on the Moral Sense. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Francis Hutcheson (1728/1769). An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections. With Illustrations Upon the Moral Sense. By Francis Hutcheson, LL.D. Late…. [REVIEW] Robert and Andrew Foulis Editors.
Francis Hutcheson (1728). Illustrations on the Moral Sense. Cambridge, Mass.,Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Douglas W. Portmore (2011). Consequentialism and Moral Rationalism. In Mark Timmons (ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics. Oxford Univ Pr
Noriaki Iwasa (2013). On Three Defenses of Sentimentalism. Prolegomena 12 (1):61-82.
Michael B. Gill (2007). Moral Rationalism Vs. Moral Sentimentalism: Is Morality More Like Math or Beauty? Philosophy Compass 2 (1):16–30.
Aaron Szymkowiak (2007). Hutcheson's Painless Imagination and the Problem of Moral Beauty. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (3):349-368.
Noriaki Iwasa (2011). Hume's Alleged Success Over Hutcheson. Synthesis Philosophica 26 (2):323-336.
James A. Harris (2008). Religion in Hutcheson's Moral Philosophy. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):pp. 205-222.
Simon Grote (2006). Hutcheson's Divergence From Shaftesbury. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 4 (2):159-172.
Noriaki Iwasa (2011). Sentimentalism and the Is-Ought Problem. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (33):323-352.
Maria Elton (2008). Moral Sense and Natural Reason. Review of Metaphysics 62 (1):79-110.
Added to index2012-01-29
Total downloads145 ( #26,626 of 1,911,524 )
Recent downloads (6 months)66 ( #7,599 of 1,911,524 )
How can I increase my downloads?