David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1994)
This is the companion volume to Gregory Vlastos' highly acclaimed work Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Four ground-breaking papers which laid the basis for his understanding of Socrates are collected here, in revised form: they examine Socrates' elenctic method of investigative argument, his disavowal of knowledge, his concern for definition, and the complications of his relationship with the Athenian democracy. The fifth chapter is a new and provocative discussion of Socrates' arguments in the Protagoras and Laches. The epilogue 'Socrates and Vietnam' suggests that Socrates was not, as Plato claimed, the most just man of his time. The papers have been prepared for publication by Professor Myles Burnyeat with the minimum of editorial intervention.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$18.89 used (59% off) $35.39 new (22% off) $35.39 direct from Amazon (22% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B317.V57 1994|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Amber Carpenter & Jonardon Ganeri (2009). Can You Seek the Answer to This Question?(Meno in India). Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):571-594.
Sarah Lublink (2011). Who May Live the Examined Life? Plato's Rejection of Socratic Practices in Republic VII. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (1):3-18.
Thomas F. Morris (2014). Why Socrates Does Not Request Exile in the Apology. Heythrop Journal 55 (1):73-85.
Shigeru Yonezawa (2012). Socratic Courage in Plato's Socratic Dialogues. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (4):645 - 665.
Pierdaniele Giaretta & Giuseppe Spolaore (2012). Validity and Effectiveness of Ambiguity: A Famous Argument by Socrates. [REVIEW] Argumentation 26 (3):393-407.
Similar books and articles
Gregory Vlastos (1991). Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Cornell University Press.
Tea Logar (2010). “Diagnostic Hedonism” and the Role of Incommensurability in Plato's Protagoras. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):241-257.
Marina Berzins McCoy (2005). Reason and Dialectic in the Argument Against Protagoras in the Theaetetus. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (1):21-39.
Jacob Howland (2006). Kierkegaard and Socrates: A Study in Philosophy and Faith. Cambridge University Press.
Raphael Woolf (2002). Consistency and Akrasia in Plato's Protagoras. Phronesis 47 (3):224-252.
Catherine H. Zuckert (2009). Plato's Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues. The University of Chicago Press.
Gregory Vlastos (1971). The Philosophy of Socrates. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Gregory Vlastos (1980). The Philosophy of Socrates: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Julie Piering (2010). Irony and Shame in Socratic Ethics. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):473-488.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads91 ( #13,185 of 1,101,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #34,568 of 1,101,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?