Switch to: References

Citations of:

Kant’s Refutation of Materialism

The Monist 72 (2):190-208 (1989)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Self-understanding in Kant's transcendental deduction.Derk Pereboom - 1995 - Synthese 103 (1):1 - 42.
    I argue that §§15–20 of the B-Deduction contain two independent arguments for the applicability of a priori concepts, the first an argument from above, the second an argument from below. The core of the first argument is §16's explanation of our consciousness of subject-identity across self-attributions, while the focus of the second is §18's account of universality and necessity in our experience. I conclude that the B-Deduction comprises powerful strategies for establishing its intended conclusion, and that some assistance from empirical (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • On the Transcendental Freedom of the Intellect.Colin McLear - 2020 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 7:35-104.
    Kant holds that the applicability of the moral ‘ought’ depends on a kind of agent-causal freedom that is incompatible with the deterministic structure of phenomenal nature. I argue that Kant understands this determinism to threaten not just morality but the very possibility of our status as rational beings. Rational beings exemplify “cognitive control” in all of their actions, including not just rational willing and the formation of doxastic attitudes, but also more basic cognitive acts such as judging, conceptualizing, and synthesizing.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • The question of the subject: Heidegger and the transcendental tradition.David Carr - 1994 - Human Studies 17 (4):403 - 418.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Heidegger and philosophical modernism.William D. Blattner - 1995 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):257 – 276.
    Pippin's accusation that Heidegger's account of modernity and the History of Being are pre?Critical or dogmatic can be rebutted by understanding Heidegger's later writings more thoroughly in terms of his earlier and by requiring Heidegger to modify the texture, though not the philosophy, of his narrative. Heidegger's thesis that epochal transitions in the History of Being are contingent and inexplicable can be rendered consistent with Critical epistemology, whose central thrust is to deny the Myth of the Given, by understanding the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • „Spontaniczność poznania”. Zależność „Analityki transcendentalnej” od rozwiązania trzeciej antynomii.Marcus Willaschek & Przeł. Wojciech Hanuszkiewicz - 2013 - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 3 (2):491-511.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation