- The Enthymeme in Aristotle's Rhetoric: From Argumentation Theory to Logic.Antoine C. Braet - 1999 - Informal Logic 19 (2).details
|
|
The Common Topic in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Precursor of the Argumentation Scheme.Antoine C. Braet - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (1):65-83.details
|
|
Premissary relevance.J. Anthony Blair - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):203-217.details
|
|
The Oldest Typology of Argumentation Schemes.Antoine C. Braet - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (1):127-148.details
|
|
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair.John Anthony Blair - 2011 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.) - 2012 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Annotating Argument Schemes.Jacky Visser, John Lawrence, Chris Reed, Jean Wagemans & Douglas Walton - 2020 - Argumentation 35 (1):101-139.details
|
|
The Study of Metaphor in Argumentation Theory.Lotte van Poppel - 2021 - Argumentation 35 (1):177-208.details
|
|
Laypeople’s Evaluation of Arguments: Are Criteria for Argument Quality Scheme-Specific?Peter Jan Schellens, Ester Šorm, Rian Timmers & Hans Hoeken - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (4):681-703.details
|
|
The Revelation Argument. A 'Communicational Fallacy'.Marco Rühl - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):73-96.details
|
|
Book reviews. [REVIEW]Agnès Van Rees, David Hitchcock, Peter Jan Schellens, Charles Arthur Willard & Thomas B. Farrell - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (2):301-328.details
|
|
Argumentation Schemes in Persuasive Brochures.Peter Jan Schellens & Menno de Jong - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (3):295-323.details
|
|
The empirical relevance of Perelman's New Rhetoric.Manfred Kienpointner - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (4):419-437.details
|
|
“You Think That Says a Lot, but Really it Says Nothing”: An Argumentative and Linguistic Account of an Idiomatic Expression Functioning as a Presentational Device.Henrike Jansen - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (4):615-640.details
|
|
Argumentative Use and Strategic Function of the Expression ‘Not for Nothing’.Henrike Jansen & Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (2):143-162.details
|
|
Points of View.Peter Houtlosser - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (3):387-405.details
|
|
Comparing the Actual and Expected Persuasiveness of Evidence Types: How Good are Lay People at Selecting Persuasive Evidence? [REVIEW]Jos Hornikx - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (4):555-569.details
|
|
Why Logic Doesn 't Matter in the (Philosophical) Study of Argumentation'.Tim Heysse - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (2):211-224.details
|
|
The Appeal to Expert Opinion: Quantitative Support for a Bayesian Network Approach.Adam J. L. Harris, Ulrike Hahn, Jens K. Madsen & Anne S. Hsu - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (6):1496-1533.details
|
|
A normative framework for argument quality: argumentation schemes with a Bayesian foundation.Ulrike Hahn & Jos Hornikx - 2016 - Synthese 193 (6):1833-1873.details
|
|
The Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Teleological Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (4):489-506.details
|
|
The Rule of Similarity as Intercultural Basis of Defeasible Argumentation.Michael Hoppmann - unknowndetails
|
|
Constructing a Periodic Table of Arguments.H. M. Wagemans Jean - unknowndetails
|
|
Commentary on Ruhl.Jean Goodwin - unknowndetails
|
|
Choosing variants of pragmatic argumentation in anticipation of countermoves in health brochures.Lotte van Poppel & Linda Carozza - unknowndetails
|
|
Preciseness is a virtue: What are critical questions?Michael J. Hoppmann - unknowndetails
|
|
Argument schemes—an epistemological approach.Christoph Lumer - 2011 - Argumentation. Cognition and Community. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18-22, 2011.details
|
|
Argument and Authority: On the Pragmatic Basis of Accepting an Appeal to Authority.Marco Ruhl - unknowndetails
|
|