Redefending Nonhuman Justice in Complex Animal Communities: A Response to Jacobs

Journal of Animal Ethics 8 (2):159-165 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In response to my argument against Aristotle’s claim that humans are more political than other animals, Edward Jacobs counters that the evidence I use from cognitive ethology and my application of evolutionary principles fail to demonstrate that other animals are as political as humans. Jacobs furthermore suggests that humans are more political than other animals by pointing to the political variation in human communities. In this article, I defend my use of evolutionary principles and my interpretation of anecdotes from cognitive ethology, while challenging Jacobs’s assertion that human political variation implies that humans are more political than other animals.

Similar books and articles

Nonhuman Animal Property: Reconciling Environmentalism and Animal Rights.John Hadley - 2005 - Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (3):305–315.
“Aristotle and the Zoon Politkon”: A Response to Abbate.Edward Jacobs - 2018 - Journal of Animal Ethics 8 (2):150-158.
Engaging the Animal in the Moving Image.Pete Porter - 2006 - Society and Animals 14 (4):399.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-22

Downloads
72 (#165,321)

6 months
11 (#74,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Cheryl (C.E.) Abbate
University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Citations of this work

“Aristotle and the Zoon Politkon”: A Response to Abbate.Edward Jacobs - 2018 - Journal of Animal Ethics 8 (2):150-158.

Add more citations