Fairness, Free-Riding and Rainforest Protection

Political Theory 44 (1):106-130 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If dangerous climate change is to be avoided, it is vital that carbon sinks such as tropical rainforests are protected. But protecting them has costs. These include opportunity costs: the potential economic benefits which those who currently control rainforests have to give up when they are protected. But who should bear those costs? Should countries which happen to have rainforests within their territories sacrifice their own economic development, because of our broader global interests in protecting key carbon sinks? This essay develops an argument from the “principle of fairness,” which seeks to establish that outsiders should pay states with rainforests so as to share the costs of protection. If they do not, they can be condemned for free-riding on forest states. The argument is, I suggest, compelling and also capable of enjoying support from adherents of a wide variety of positions on global justice.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-28

Downloads
511 (#38,664)

6 months
108 (#44,884)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chris Armstrong
University of Southampton

References found in this work

Are there any natural rights?H. L. A. Hart - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (2):175-191.
Global justice, reciprocity, and the state.Andrea Sangiovanni - 2007 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (1):3–39.
Moral Free Riding.Garrett Cullity - 1995 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (1):3-34.
Rights, Equality and Procreation.Paula Casal & Andrew Williams - 1995 - Analyse & Kritik 17 (1):93-116.
Environmentalism, procreation, and the principle of fairness.Paula Casal - 1999 - Public Affairs Quarterly 13 (4):363-376.

View all 6 references / Add more references