The inference to the best explanation

Erkenntnis 33 (3):319-44 (1990)
Abstract
In a situation in which several explanations compete, is the one that is better qua explanation also the one we should regard as the more likely to be true? Realists usually answer in the affirmative. They then go on to argue that since realism provides the best explanation for the success of science, realism can be inferred to. Nonrealists, on the other hand, answer the above question in the negative, thereby renouncing the inference to realism. In this paper I separate the two issues. In the first section it is argued that a rationale can be provided for the inference to the best explanation; in the second, that this rationale cannot justify an inference to realism. The defence of the inference rests on the claim that our standards of explanatory power are subject to critical examination, which, in turn, should be informed by empirical considerations. By means of a comparison of the realist's explanation for the success of science with that of conventionalism and instrumentalism it is then shown that realism does not offer a superior explanation and should not, therefore, be inferred to.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00717590
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,308
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
How the Laws of Physics Lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
Meaning and the Moral Sciences.Hilary Putnam - 1978 - Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Laws and Symmetry.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 1989 - Oxford University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Inference to the Loveliest Explanation.Eric Barnes - 1995 - Synthese 103 (2):251 - 277.
Realism and the Epistemological Significance of Inference to the Best Explanation.Hamid Vahid - 2001 - Dialogue (Canadian Philosophical Association) 40 (3):487-507.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 2004 - Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
Review Symposium.Ken Binmore - 1985 - Thesis Eleven 12 (1):145-155.
Explanation and Epistemology.William G. Lycan - 2002 - In Paul K. Moser (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 413.
Why the Ultimate Argument for Scientific Realism Ultimately Fails.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):132-138.
The Functions of Fossils: Inference and Explanation in Functional Morphology.D. Turner - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 31 (1):193-212.
Abduction and Scientific Realism.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:137-142.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
227 ( #16,838 of 2,180,222 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #68,631 of 2,180,222 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums