Trading Vulnerabilities: Living with Parkinson’s Disease before and after Deep Brain Stimulation

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (4):623-630 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Implanted medical devices—for example, cardiac defibrillators, deep brain stimulators, and insulin pumps—offer users the possibility of regaining some control over an increasingly unruly body, the opportunity to become part “cyborg” in service of addressing pressing health needs. We recognize the value and effectiveness of such devices, but call attention to what may be less clear to potential users—that their vulnerabilities may not entirely disappear but instead shift. We explore the kinds of shifting vulnerabilities experienced by people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) who receive therapeutic deep brain stimulators to help control their tremors and other symptoms of PD.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Broader Challenges for DBS in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.Robin Pierce - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (4):81-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
20 (#760,329)

6 months
10 (#382,354)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sara Goering
University of Washington

Citations of this work

What does it mean to call a medical device invasive?Eran Klein - 2023 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 26 (3):325-334.

Add more citations