Cognitive Science 36 (3):498-516 (2012)
For decisions between many alternatives, the benchmark result is Hick's Law: that response time increases log-linearly with the number of choice alternatives. Even when Hick's Law is observed for response times, divergent results have been observed for error rates—sometimes error rates increase with the number of choice alternatives, and sometimes they are constant. We provide evidence from two experiments that error rates are mostly independent of the number of choice alternatives, unless context effects induce participants to trade speed for accuracy across conditions. Error rate data have previously been used to discriminate between competing theoretical accounts of Hick's Law, and our results question the validity of those conclusions. We show that a previously dismissed optimal observer model might provide a parsimonious account of both response time and error rate data. The model suggests that people approximate Bayesian inference in multi-alternative choice, except for some perceptual limitations
|Keywords||Multi‐alternative choice Optimal observer Speed–accuracy tradeoff Bayesian Hick's Law Context effect|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Mathematical Theory of Communication.Claude E. Shannon & Warren Weaver - 1949 - University of Illinois Press.
Stimulus Information as a Determinant of Reaction Time.Ray Hyman - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (3):188.
Hick's Law and the Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Absolute Judgment.Robert G. Pachella & Dennis Fisher - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (3):378.
Some Variables Influencing the Rate of Gain of Information.Robert W. Brainard, Thomas S. Irby, Paul M. Fitts & Earl A. Alluisi - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (2):105.
Speed-Error Tradeoff in a Three-Choice Serial Reaction Task.D. J. Hale - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (3):428.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Quantum Probability Account of Order Effects in Inference.Jennifer S. Trueblood & Jerome R. Busemeyer - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (8):1518-1552.
Intransitive Cycles: Rational Choice or Random Error? An Answer Based on Estimation of Error Rates with Experimental Data.Barry Sopher & Gary Gigliotti - 1993 - Theory and Decision 35 (3):311-336.
A Dynamic Context Model of Interactive Behavior.Wai-Tat Fu - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (5):874-904.
Sophisticated Voting Under the Sequential Voting by Veto.Fany Yuval - 2002 - Theory and Decision 53 (4):343-369.
A Computational and Empirical Investigation of Graphemes in Reading.Conrad Perry, Johannes C. Ziegler & Marco Zorzi - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (5):800-828.
The Future Has Thicker Tails Than the Past: Model Error as Branching Counterfactuals.Nassim N. Taleb - manuscript
The Epistemology and Ethics of Early Stopping Decisions in Randomized Controlled Trials.Roger Stanev - 2012 - Dissertation, University of British Columbia
Error Statistics and Learning From Error: Making a Virtue of Necessity.Deborah G. Mayo - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):212.
A Possibilistic Hierarchical Model for Behaviour Under Uncertainty.de Cooman Gert & Walley Peter - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (4):327-374.
On the Observability of Purely Behavioral Sunk-Cost Effects: Theoretical and Empirical Support for the BISC Model.Marcus Cunha & Fabio Caldieraro - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (8):1384-1387.
Added to index2012-01-19
Total downloads29 ( #173,330 of 2,154,177 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #397,226 of 2,154,177 )
How can I increase my downloads?