Technological paternalism: On how medicine has reformed ethics and how technology can refine moral theory

Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):343-352 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The objective of this article is to investigate ethical aspects of technology through the moral term “paternalism”. The field of investigation is medicine. The reason for this is twofold. Firstly, “paternalism” has gained moral relevance through modern medicine, where physicians have been accused of behaving paternalistic and threatening patients’ autonomy. Secondly, medicine is a brilliant area to scrutinise the evaluative aspects of technology. It is argued that paternalism is a morally relevant term for the ethics of technology, but that its traditional conception is not adequate to address the challenges of modern technology. A modification towards a “technological paternalism” is necessary. That is, “technological paternalism” is a fruitful term in the ethics of technology. Moreover, it is suited to point out the deficiencies of the traditional concept of paternalism and to reform and vitalise the conception of paternalism in ethics in order to handle the challenges of technology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
11 (#1,167,245)

6 months
67 (#78,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Online Forums Can Alleviate the Care Crisis.Mahdi Khalili & Saeedeh Babaei - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations 16 (41):174-188.
The Search for Reasons in a Unified Relationship.Elysa R. Koppelman-White - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (5):447-469.
CQ Sources/Bibliography.Bette Anton - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):348-350.
CQ Sources/Bibliography.Bette Anton - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (2).

View all 6 citations / Add more citations