Philosophy of Science 56 (4):675-680 (1989)

Authors
Colin Howson
London School of Economics
Abstract
Dunn and Hellman's objection to Popper and Miller's alleged disproof of inductive probability is considered and rejected. Dunn and Hellman base their objection on a decomposition of the incremental support P(h/e)-P(h) of h by e dual to that of Popper and Miller, and argue, dually to Popper and Miller, to a conclusion contrary to the latters' that all support is deductive in character. I contend that Dunn and Hellman's dualizing argument fails because the elements of their decomposition are not supports of parts of h. I conclude by reinforcing a different line of criticism of Popper and Miller due to Redhead
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289520
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,634
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Probabilistic Support, Probabilistic Induction and Bayesian Confirmation Theory.Andres Rivadulla - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):477-483.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Some Further Reflections on the Popper-Miller 'Disproof' of Probabilistic Induction.Colin Howson - 1990 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (2):221 – 228.
Contentious Contents: For Inductive Probability.Andrew Elby - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):193-200.
In Defense of the Popper-Miller Argument.Donald Gillies - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (1):110-113.
A Suspicious Feature of the Popper/Miller Argument.I. J. Good - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (3):535-536.
Partly Deductive Support in the Popper-Miller Argument.Burke Townsend - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (3):490-496.
Dualling: A Critique of an Argument of Popper and Miller.J. Michael Dunn & Geoffrey Hellman - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (2):220-223.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
31 ( #319,201 of 2,348,973 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #512,628 of 2,348,973 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes