- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Review: Some Problems for Reductive Physicalism [Book Review]
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (3):648 - 654 (2002)
Abstract
I examine and discuss Jaegwon Kim's arguments against non-reductive physicalism in his book, Mind in a Physical World. I first examine the supervenience argument and then the multiple realization argument. Finally, I raise some questions about Kim's overall attitude towards mental realism, i.e., realism about mental properties.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Some problems for reductive physicalism. [REVIEW]Pierre Jacob - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (3):648-654.
The supervenience argument against non-reductive physicalism.Andrew Russo - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.
Dennett’s Account of Mind versus Kim’s Supervenience Argument.Zbigniew Marczuk - 2011 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 16 (2):1-15.
Dennett’s Account of Mind versus Kim’s Supervenience Argument.Zbigniew Marczuk - 2011 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 16 (2):1-15.
The Supervenience Argument against Non‐Reductive Physicalism.Andrew Russo - 2011-09-16 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 314–317.
Type Physicalism and Causal Exclusion.Joseph A. Baltimore - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Research 38:405-418.
The Significance of Emergence.Tim Crane - 2001 - In Barry Loewer & Grant Gillett (eds.), Physicalism and its Discontents.
Multiple Types Physicalism: Infirmities of Non-reductive Physicalism.Gerhard Preyer & Erwin Rogler - 2022 - ProtoSociology 39:51-86.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-05-29
Downloads
35 (#471,200)
6 months
3 (#1,045,901)
2011-05-29
Downloads
35 (#471,200)
6 months
3 (#1,045,901)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Functional Reduction and Mental Causation.Dwayne Moore & Neil Campbell - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (4):435-446.
Pains, Pills and Properties - Functionalism and the First-Order/Second-Order Distinction.Raphael van Riel - 2012 - Dialectica 66 (4):543-562.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-sz9d2 uwo